From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34578)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hmy7P-0007Wq-ON
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 06:22:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hmy7O-0006ZN-FF
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 06:22:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37654)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hmy7O-0006ZA-9R
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 06:22:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hmy7O-0007x3-3v
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 06:22:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#33899] [PATCH 0/5] Distributing substitutes over IPFS
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33899.B33899.156318610530541@debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:21:29 +0000
From: Hector Sanjuan <code@hector.link>
Message-ID: <TbeM3tgSHfcbwcjeZ6QdzDTvWhrkzeTEnWCbfJxJfx4sPZRGupGThXLKTPafQnN2u-MrQ_zcST3TawHVICLzaQAq9gG11BXkNNqgzBkXg6U=@hector.link>
In-Reply-To: <87zhlf7glw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <20181228231205.8068-1-ludo@gnu.org>
 <neM1uqJ3yxqbJiTzV6-q6R-8GNGjv7l_7TJhhQIGXpDQbLoS8yIYrJ4KxKYmFwpi1O9YePH3d5i3fknYgv7nfuMrXFgYoxsk_Xxgs9_Sd2U=@hector.link>
 <8736pqthqm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <pa258vxfuaaiuhOEdEpZPTqfDHe4hoICI7EPyJ284kk6qVWc_VakU3cwxbx46BVXobg0LMWyrjE_uX6nJ6XoJj78-mfjtsejqHlx3bmkNFw=@hector.link>
 <87zhlxe8t9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87ftnbf1rt.fsf@gnu.org>
 <HAv_FWZRa_dCADY6U07oX-E2vTrtcxk8ltkpfvTpYCsIh4O5PuItHGIh6w-g5GGmoqVEfkjDUOplpUErdGEPAiFYdrjjDhwd9RJ4OyjjGgY=@hector.link>
 <87ef2rr6om.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhlf7glw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Hector Sanjuan <code@hector.link>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: Antoine Eiche <lewo@abesis.fr>, "go-ipfs-wg\\@ipfs.io" <go-ipfs-wg@ipfs.io>, "33899\\@debbugs.gnu.org" <33899@debbugs.gnu.org>

=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me=
ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
On Monday, July 15, 2019 12:10 PM, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> wro=
te:

> H=C3=A9ctor mentioned a possible issue with the IPLD manifest growing too=
 big
> (in case of too many files in a package), that is, above 2MB.
> Then we would need to implement some form of sharding.
>
> H=C3=A9ctor, do you confirm? Any idea on how to tackle this elegantly?
>

Doing the DAG node the way I proposed it (referencing a single root) should=
 be
ok... Unless you put too many executable files in that list, it should larg=
ely
stay within the 2MB limit.


--
Hector