From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shtwzrd via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: bug#39352: guix pull failing on aarch64 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 22:52:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <37458edae787384d433d43afb1c2ca9192f94056.camel@gmail.com> <875zgo65vn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: shtwzrd , shtwzrd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1eOs-0001nG-QN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:53:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1eOr-000099-TF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:53:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1eOr-00008Z-QN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:53:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j1eOr-0002mk-Nn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:53:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <875zgo65vn.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: "39352@debbugs.gnu.org" <39352@debbugs.gnu.org>, Jesse Gibbons Ludo said: > I believe the problem is not deterministic, so it may be that retrying > =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99 will work=E2=80=A6 I take back what I said; I tried one more time today just out of curiosity,= and it actually succeeded. I tried four more times afterward though and it failed the same way as it h= as before. So just as you said, it's not deterministic, but it fails much more often t= han not in my particular situation. If there's any extra information I can give that could help people debug th= is, please let me know. Hunting down a hard to reproduce error is the worst= . :)