From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:5f26::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id oFnxN/sPl2UTmgAAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 21:07:23 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id QBsWNPsPl2UyLQAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 21:07:23 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tuta.io header.s=s1 header.b=v2qQLoaV; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1704398843; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=03Vq5tseWXAeqG9Ozn2x43ofmBJRr/Xh4dp3C/hHPI4=; b=kfZ1zB1wq7Fm2Y9txEk5rqsNKQi7HYjRlLmQLmKxzy9LNARz/5wddzi18+tmnjfwtoMxnO AM7OqMdwcY3BCwYIf0KGwickay9CyM//jxzDX7SBpUX9lPP6g/OerTBfrp2IkQMq1nvjdQ g4ygrhv/gd9vgBPWeJ9Ll4fjQ1zdixmU0ch7eIkMHdrRs7Y2qGu2ch+1sSeUE0so8iEcUc ochbEngS4hDpwrvArTqzE7ehPdJHBCZUqCn33kck3erWX398GdVfWf9wUOIgnqsU3IOfaL 5v8sCsx+qJwvWWbiEyu6kh3IUoFixseUlqgnc67rtSvD7Z9nTEr2/lhZQLjXRw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1704398843; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=orf7e3Aesw00Kr6CWZTYFSz+GH77UHUTkpwXLPuOPmFrllWYjMnz4+T2H/L9OzRFDDczO9 4IKwCcfLuRwlBlF4a0DX6l4EuZ7nxdCYnK/KM6OmYAcD3i9Nr5n6R2X48723T4ey/61KpX reP8LxKeWndn0v5BEJBEwh37dXvCQNt1wlQGgVT3HqLLXHtDUu+N6jeq298K3m48x00pHr XRXXhs0ghCMSBk1uLbXGDXh8epERDop38Xg0jOXERLB8gC2LRzl7Th08HBgSXHf6cEO9Ls 9DEbCpE6WU8qO2OjDimY0rdJ+K5A2Jia/rsz5XlEyq5hyvOr3/hx+jAjbbbGyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tuta.io header.s=s1 header.b=v2qQLoaV; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7223A35052 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:07:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLTzc-0002sW-5K; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 15:07:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rKxKu-0000Vm-Mu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 04:14:52 -0500 Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rKxKs-0003ZR-Lq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 04:14:52 -0500 Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791DFFBFC18; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:14:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1704273286; s=s1; d=tuta.io; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=03Vq5tseWXAeqG9Ozn2x43ofmBJRr/Xh4dp3C/hHPI4=; b=v2qQLoaVP2aO/muLplJiqQNQnHA30j1qt5hBUInZEErw1GV9bKMt9BCbpBXkW06Y 3bErbMDqrG/8kwYBTHKIBgtDS2p/5d+snA+ZXCYhk6Zx0LYYrLE7Ar/pYucO306CkLK Pujp9z/MLqQNTaVpXitmAElOXsDzcyVPJHICmPz0fOyUk+S44Sw5uL2DYXHEjptl+BI jS0/07n7Yx1z2dWLjAsKoy0Ya8YSRsbu0z0DKJqFIexATGxKMq9zm6kotqldVC9OPPl OYvUtiqmqsHWN2WHOHEO/WA6zm1/ff5/F8MiVxtfq58x23TxY9NBN4OcKgcA6CA7wSx HZRD7wdISw== Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:14:46 +0100 (CET) To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: guix-devel , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Ekaitz Zarraga Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87h6jvoftr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87edf4s7vw.fsf@gmail.com> <87o7e6pb00.fsf@gmail.com> <87h6jvoftr.fsf@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Suggestion for a guix shell feature. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_65158_791456747.1704273286489" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.162; envelope-from=apoorvs@tuta.io; helo=w1.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 15:06:55 -0500 X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Apoorv From: Apoorv via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.28 X-Spam-Score: -4.28 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7223A35052 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: 7jXxfDjKDpZp ------=_Part_65158_791456747.1704273286489 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK, it was my bad I had an older copy of guix.scm file I was passing that, it didn't have cargo-build-system. But now I'm getting so many other errors related to cargo deps missing or version mismatch, I tried adding those deps spent like 1-2 hours but something dep was still missing or version mismatch, finally I gave up. I'm not sure how many deps I have to add like this.. this is getting way to complicated then it needs to be. -- Sent with Tuta; enjoy secure & ad-free emails: https://tuta.com Jan 2, 2024, 16:33 by maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com: > Hi, > > Apoorv writes: > >> I can add rust:cargo but the package definition in the guix.scm is already using `cargo-build-system` shouldn't it include rust and cargo etc automatically? >> > > It should, but if it doesn't you may want to review how rust:cargo input > gets added to the cargo-build-system; perhaps it's done in a ad-hoc > fashion that causes that problem. > > -- > Thanks, > Maxim > ------=_Part_65158_791456747.1704273286489 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
OK, it was my bad I had an older copy of guix.scm file I was passing t= hat, it didn't have cargo-build-system. But now I'm getting so many other e= rrors related to cargo deps missing or version mismatch, I tried adding tho= se deps spent like 1-2 hours but something dep was still missing or version= mismatch, finally I gave up. I'm not sure how many deps I have to add like= this.. this is getting way to complicated then it needs to be.

--
Sent with Tuta; enjoy secure & ad-= free emails:
https://tuta.com

=
Jan 2, 2024, 16:33 by maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com:
Hi,

Apoorv <apoorvs@tuta.io> writes:
I can add ru= st:cargo but the package definition in the guix.scm is already using `cargo= -build-system` shouldn't it include rust and cargo etc automatically?

It should, but if it doesn't you may want to= review how rust:cargo input
gets added to the cargo-build-sy= stem; perhaps it's done in a ad-hoc
fashion that causes that = problem.

--
Thanks,
Maxim

------=_Part_65158_791456747.1704273286489--