From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uJ9jHE98+18WCQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:14:39 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id GJk7GE98+1+ISAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:14:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C63F9402AF for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53982 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyiys-0001Ie-4s for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:14:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyiyd-0001Go-NZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:14:23 -0500 Received: from mail-40137.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.137]:38577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyiyZ-0005HE-FY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:14:23 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:14:05 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1610316856; bh=eLeiLl8KP0zgf7C7zI48s17fUyRR87oIcYMCAPfugs8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pQnyYNwSu0072rmDASf2yxnltXKl0L8FqR4G/pbq4BT5jlez+cr0vp6SvCj5S9mNK mp+ZSB+Adyie6HpiE04KwnWz369+8Sywu9HSYpWZkMQ0y+lCOBBWbtDCK35JaBFFDD ohwe3s2UVYial3iAGH08OvYwui6VtZN4IADOcv50= To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: Cuirass logo - artwork. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87h7nopsju.fsf@nckx> References: <87bldzu64t.fsf@gnu.org> <8IQXp0MGh8RPw3OizFH2VEwKOdLJR_SJosbTT2z2nJFdzpIlrXHx7CPoHC-_hKt9AjXKfej1XAgLEj18wFmoVWRxPBUKLF20JuLY_Nh6w5E=@protonmail.com> <87h7nopsju.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.137; envelope-from=luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40137.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" , Mathieu Othacehe Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" Reply-to: Luis Felipe , Luis Felipe From: Luis Felipe via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.85 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=pQnyYNwS; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2C63F9402AF X-Spam-Score: -2.85 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: SWBqXmrSy02Z Hey, Tobias, =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Sunday, January 10, 2021 6:15 PM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice w= rote: [...] > Like the others I prefer the orange/black colour scheme. It integrates be= tter with other Guix sites & the other one has less positive connotiations. Oh, really?! I know people associate these colors to political parties and = sports teams depending on the region they live... Is there anything else co= nsidered negative about the blue-red scheme? > Row B's =E2=80=98S=E2=80=99 just looks off; I prefer C's. Is this a stock= typeface? No, they are just rectangles. > I see =E2=80=98integration=E2=80=99 in the logo but not in =E2=80=98//= =E2=80=99. OK, so it just looks like a link between the top and bottom parts of the S.= But since the text-based logo has no votes for now, I'll just ignore it :) By the way, I forgot to mention that the S in B and C variants also were su= pposed to symbolize the continuous part of CI. They were supposed to look c= lose to the infinity symbol (drawn vertically). > The logo comes frustratingly close to =E2=80=98CI=E2=80=99 whilst (to my = eye) trying very hard not to :-) A bit like the name =E2=80=98Cuirass= =E2=80=99. Where did that come from, Mathieu? Pierre asked this same question earlier: Pierre: Why is it called "Cuirass"? :p Othacehe: No idea, you would have to ask Mathieu Lirzin about it! About the integration of this logo with the Guix look, I thought that this = logo was for Cuirass itself, not necessarily for the instance available in = https://ci.guix.gnu.org/. If Cuirass Web UI supports theming, the Guix instance could easily change t= he branding so that it is uniform with the style that has been used so far = to name and brand other components. So Guix components like GuixHPC, GuixDa= ta, GuixCI, GuixDays, and so on, could use the same graphic style. (Maybe Guix could use a Guile library defining an SXHTML/CSS theme to make = it easier to style the websites of the different Guix components)