From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id eAHIJ2E3Z2YyrwAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:26:57 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id eAHIJ2E3Z2YyrwAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:26:57 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=VRk4Mc7c; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1718040417; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=AstPv/ocvRBRE+s3Y00aj4pzsaM5BNikHLqHW7vFVrNwK3b7bJ74SNj0bKCtkHQShb/Ilj /qhxIYdKI7/2Tak/EuxkNo+/qGTHt09g+bd+5BNoqQj0FAGKnBwdpeyBQGOpbNH/jhHFDl cGVlnmIBDyl+KLgUVDc9MxiacLviFreBJUUEiy10cfq1ykblZByiFRhfO2dWw8yetq7aYD af1mzBPeJPVj0XNufIYDCg8lBdHQSVCX7wqoAqKC3boTKUVqzRL4gvnodfKL81lsDvv6Ug C09VnT+FkBex2+U8qO+T/Jryty/YK+CDdL5KpM71Y/sWNwLK7AOWDOh8EgXSNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=VRk4Mc7c; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1718040417; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=dxOyV0d9VeZszG76vJaXEf7IYfvpao2cRTUwJSgK8Z4=; b=Y1fkmzh9HsLlEjYwU449Yn8jDUbNK92/vSH7HKHvZvvyKwAQhp0Rc8eGpGM7a1WmM3BCFZ BqbfmF9TGLDtLP4W5Q2NrirGa+hk9P/HzKQg+qNGvnk5h8QwZEK883A40bzeM9fmofTvrY 4C2lwVp3XXOCUrf4/AKoStYsN5/jBUDNLn6oHak1nG19zdMVSDFFLjeg4jhOXcYM6zZ1Ra VddvqsWreO385qJJ/xEGwi8ZPQ9mWgo11IVaCwyd9uG86S2noOgl6xqJydAG9s9Bipi0h5 OHBRXKwhvkv2gw5TTUf/7aYJzg05ZRiwevN7MpYrhbgo88YsbK0BK24XnBLbOw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61E8168704 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:26:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGimj-0003N1-JB; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:26:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGimd-0003MC-OK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:26:15 -0400 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGimb-0003gh-8r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:26:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1718040370; x=1718299570; bh=dxOyV0d9VeZszG76vJaXEf7IYfvpao2cRTUwJSgK8Z4=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=VRk4Mc7cLu36QX/LeLIsvRrMhmDqU9so6s09LzYKdXBtXIH+wAfP2gSKClqOHSttO MdWfXikcyp6z5vdUs0aWslBe7LYKWUaUiZuDppUBEMUd3D0ikn703uTa10SsxbMIru iuMERvhWbTeOqmLOJICHkQeOhpN5NcETxhCzbhJlDVgE9ovUSz0VQTjA1TfPucGSb8 dmuuwB5y/84BkoCX5vIWi206/OArcCQteDAl3pJUK3uY2wxFCEOxu4YEeluogohwNT 2vWJG6zUJM1NX2VCGQjl0LsCHMhZSiCHc0EL8quoFLNEdSxnvH0q1laHDU0X2e7X8G LZHZtxO9BazkQ== Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:26:06 +0000 To: Andreas Enge From: Kaelyn Cc: Leo Famulari , =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= , guix-devel@gnu.org, Zheng Junjie Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.9. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <171746516380.7429.1293440427932042426@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240604013924.59F27C1F9EA@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87r0dd8b10.fsf@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: 34709329:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 57d17c383cfcbde37c66f5d88fe7f2bbb229a448 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.131; envelope-from=kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40131.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 61E8168704 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.77 X-Spam-Score: -9.77 X-TUID: 1wRFJ5CHlul2 Hi, On Monday, June 10th, 2024 at 2:26 AM, Andreas Enge wrote= : >=20 >=20 > Am Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 09:19:14PM -0400 schrieb Leo Famulari: >=20 > > You're right, it was ZFS itself failing to build. > > *** ZFS Version: zfs-2.2.3-1 > > *** Compatible Kernels: 3.10 - 6.7 > > Should we change something about zfs-auto-snapshot? Or is the status qu= o > > okay? >=20 >=20 > Somebody has suggested an update to zfs, which apparently solves the > problem; both zfs and zfs-auto-snapshot now build according to QA: > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/71392 >=20 > I have just pushed it (forgetting that the author is a new committer, > sorry). >=20 > Andreas I saw that ZFS update patch as I was prepping my ZFS package changes for su= bmission--I had the 2.2.4 update as part of the series, and decided to wait= until the already-submitted package update landed to send in my ZFS packag= e rework. My package rework is issue #71482, and I think is a better solution since p= ackages like zfs-auto-snapshot depend on the zfs user-space tools. Addition= ally, the updated ZFS package is only a temporary fix as ZFS 2.2.4 only sup= ports up through Linux 6.8 kernels (and linux-libre 6.9 was recently made t= he default). Also, thank you Efraim and Leo for a bit of encouragement, which motivated = me to finally submit my reworked ZFS packages for upstream inclusion. :) Cheers, Kaelyn P.S. For my patch, I didn't include any calls to 'make-zfs-for-kernel' for = any of the linux-libre kernels, since the resulting packages aren't substit= utable and the kernel version needed would be use-case dependent.