From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KJVdF8GtLmD7RwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:11:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id h3cxE8GtLmB3WgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:11:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0831232EE2 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:11:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49624 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCnlg-0003gJ-3E for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:11:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCnlL-0003f0-3k for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:10:51 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:45706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCnlJ-0002fq-2O; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:10:50 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 23d70faa; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:10:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; s= dkim; bh=TtypDbEPvv6soUGREFcXk3iiXI7o/H2zHsPIQNclYe4=; b=jMERDkN K46q9Vp9yDeddnB0wPLhbh3zG8QflvW7GRfY1uyYGyxRnC4LDTVq6PksGG3FoPaH 79u2qhvlJUqdCO45pOEWUBGLVlUkFmd4v6OvLs5Wg42KPUyMJQsvYW8Bll54IwYh a25+nHbgjqdwIP+xokGcs72lFUi4tFdTKqqYwRIO1/BOyHUud2p/6qqsfGun7vIr 77P/pUDH6GSgD3UfkFGguXnZLvFfWDxYJy+0SrdQiBMRZHQ5u+SzXpOAKBRJulMM 6zP9Ge2GyB5IWVVV2GMVx+wQkCnq//p7ox74C5W11CN6QEO9TL+uXc951wJ4LpRG A9zTAFy7juDxQlw== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 947135e3 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:10:14 -0500 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <878s7lqop7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878s7lqop7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----V8JN04F3BTJ8D0NOQZPP7MGZRFDFP9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Gnome Boxes To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=89.234.186.109; envelope-from=julien@lepiller.eu; helo=lepiller.eu X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.23 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b="jMERDkN "; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=lepiller.eu (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0831232EE2 X-Spam-Score: 0.23 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 1D5F5fQIojRt ------V8JN04F3BTJ8D0NOQZPP7MGZRFDFP9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Usually compression is provided by the webserver, but maybe ours is not con= figured to do that=2E I think we're the only distro to provide compressed i= sos=2E Le 18 f=C3=A9vrier 2021 12:18:44 GMT-05:00, "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" a =C3=A9crit : >Hi, > >Julien Lepiller skribis: > >> When submitting the MR to libosinfo, there were concerns that the =2Exz >extension would cause problems with other software, so we left it out=2E >> >> I think we should provide a =2Eiso download directly, if we want gnome >boxes to propose the guix system=2E > >We could do that but=E2=80=A6 isn=E2=80=99t it a bit ridiculous? I mean,= compression >is >a well-known technique to reduce bandwidth usage, right? :-) > >That said, we now produce compressed ISOs IIRC, so it might be that the >extra compression layer doesn=E2=80=99t buy us much=2E Would be worth ch= ecking! > >Thanks, >Ludo=E2=80=99=2E ------V8JN04F3BTJ8D0NOQZPP7MGZRFDFP9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Usually compression is provided by the webserver, = but maybe ours is not configured to do that=2E I think we're the only distr= o to provide compressed isos=2E

Le 18 f= =C3=A9vrier 2021 12:18:44 GMT-05:00, "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" <ludo@gnu=2E= org> a =C3=A9crit :
Hi,

Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller=2Eeu&= gt; skribis:

When = submitting the MR to libosinfo, there were concerns that the =2Exz extensio= n would cause problems with other software, so we left it out=2E

I = think we should provide a =2Eiso download directly, if we want gnome boxes = to propose the guix system=2E

We could do that but=E2= =80=A6 isn=E2=80=99t it a bit ridiculous? I mean, compression is
a well= -known technique to reduce bandwidth usage, right? :-)

That said, w= e now produce compressed ISOs IIRC, so it might be that the
extra compre= ssion layer doesn=E2=80=99t buy us much=2E Would be worth checking!
Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99=2E
------V8JN04F3BTJ8D0NOQZPP7MGZRFDFP9--