From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOANN P Subject: Questions regarding "Relocatable" option Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:18:52 +0000 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38027) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVLDX-00089l-T1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:19:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVLDS-000087-Vo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:18:59 -0400 Received: from mail-oln040092072034.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.72.34]:33050 helo=EUR03-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVLDS-00006R-JC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:18:54 -0400 Content-Language: fr-FR List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: "guix-devel@gnu.org" Hi Guix,=0A= =0A= First, thanks for making my day when i read some days ago the post about "R= elocatable", what a great news and a killer feature ! Far better than my tr= ick exposed past weeks=A0ago to Ludovic and even better than the wrapper i = had imagine to write :)=0A= When "proot" will be included in the binary tarball and implemented with "r= elocatable", it will be awesome ! =0A= =0A= Some questions coming from this new feature that i don't already tested := =0A= =0A= - Could we hope to see it included in the next release ?=0A= =0A= - Could we hope to see it included by default in the binary tar.gz of this = next release to be able to use guix directly in an unprivileged environment= ? ( i dreaming of this every night ^^ )=0A= =0A= - Does the "relocatable" could be the default option and have an "--no-relo= catable" option for people who want to avoid the little extra time to start= an application ?=0A= =0A= - While a i write those questions, i just wondering, after compiling Guix w= ith "relocatable", does it mean we could packaging Guix itself with the "r= elocatable" option, be able to use it in an unpriviliged environment , and = by the way, having the answer to my second question ^^ ? :)=0A= =0A= Best regards, Guix it is really a good project=