From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Lepiller Subject: bug#33262: guix fails to find and use some available substitutes Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 19:45:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5C395E1E-9E2B-4696-8FC8-9EA4046A20C3@lepiller.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjt3-0008FF-6M for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:46:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjsy-0001Ua-3S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:46:09 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjsx-0001TY-Ty for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:46:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjsx-0008Bz-QK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:46:03 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: George Clemmer Cc: 33262@debbugs.gnu.org Exactly! Le 5 novembre 2018 18:21:53 GMT+01:00, George Clemmer = a =C3=A9crit : > >Julien Lepiller writes: > >> I think guix' message is a bit confusing: the =2Edrv file is always >> created by guix, it's the derivation=2E The derivation is built, which >> results in a new store path=2E It can be built locally or by using a >> substitute=2E What you see in your store is the derivation (=2Edrv), no= t >> its result=2E You can open that file to find where the result will be >> stored and check if it exists on your machine=2E > >Hi Julien, > >Thank you=2E You are right, the =2Edrv "out" substitute is not on my >local server=2E So this is not a bug=2E SORRY for the noise ;-) > >After re-reading (guix) Derivations, I see I had a wrong impression: >that the presence of a =2Edrv indicates a successful build=2E But AIUI no= w >it only means that at some point in the past we attempted to build the >=2Edrv=2E IOW, we will also have =2Edrv files for all failed builds=2E > >Is that correct? > >Thanks! - George