From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id MBRZISQZ/WJQbQAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:36:52 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id ENorISQZ/WIDHAAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:36:52 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEACD2B0BB for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:36:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56572 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOM2D-0001Cc-F4 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:36:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOLTd-0000lC-2y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:01:13 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOLTa-000312-8K for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:01:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOLTa-0006Zq-3e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#56799: (gnu services configuration) usage of *unspecified* is problematic Resent-From: "(" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56799 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Maxim Cournoyer" , "Attila Lendvai" Cc: 56799@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 56799-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56799.166075200725125 (code B ref 56799); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:01:02 +0000 Received: (at 56799) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Aug 2022 16:00:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOLSh-0006X8-8e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:00:07 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:50338) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOLSe-0006Wi-42 for 56799@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:00:06 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7757B40083; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:00:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TlUjEfUd0JmX; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:00:01 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1660752001; bh=QtlDsJsj9vrI9DJBy35EbPueTT9PRnN3Mvj8+k5/Oeo=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:From:References:In-Reply-To; b=kgNmos5P/bk6RieEVRU1yKo6N7a92pVsZOSqOQHpcfTA6Edeg7RjcwqZ7aDDHmIgI ebbbO2QY+mTl8phrCvEg2ZA8EQG7UilmS/h63hoX221rSrFhhEzENy4cRWx3jqpD2c bz+hmcG1WmRsi/v5ViPgU5y53VZzrp4m+nn0WK0IHZ2JBua1kspI9o98Wkx45M2K3j zo74FcPtyxIiXHk12z3yVvGk60sz2CwvaC1aM+Fseh6I1ZY0bdfHwtCNeGEdPnCCDo SSGLAd7mo8Xt46m4gdenSFb4GW5W+XaY9FHajHpKWFKVq0aky4bPi8R8Jq2n5P7182 b8Nj5rRqYng0A== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:00:00 +0100 Message-Id: References: <87o7xa8qxt.fsf@gmail.com> <87sfme1y8m.fsf@gmail.com> <877d3omc9c.fsf@gnu.org> <878rnwn5i4.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilmwd57k.fsf@gmail.com> <87k07bbkhq.fsf@gmail.com> <87r11f9fj2.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87r11f9fj2.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: "(" From: paren--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1660754211; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=18t8bPAQdzYAy+FESkpNupx/iDUOw8qeCC1P7p2s03E=; b=INawml3fvtBU5PR9rcbIU1li6REQbdBByeQcWQgznzOo/yXw9SvSl9xUX2dAJgTOnSQt1c 6T2gnSD/RRYIEjjAAUVZSHuqiH47NqqTZ4FUSYqPIZWni2r137KENd2W4CtrtCAE8OV2Do 4owVyENfn2CWtCvGqU6WkoZWz4x6UibMvyLPEDNZNCIOvwWBQltRRfdK5lF63tYEIZQAjN +TiDG82hX5OWf/78tWDmlUJtEeXheE8JGQtlh9YEmj0vdQSNMV+Xich3QEAMwd9HdWbk/t fDyEN73T/zkl7used8QqLBCF8FeEz8FB49BQgP8X+ZKajwDGM0FrDNLc+eKl9A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1660754211; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=icSIRqIMAw0BVlMJE3TXgYfMduoGuDQP+3CwDufKcL+rXKsVM37n4pkX4LXgLCJzhfaUVD eFx7aymJ5cU3gzADM9i1mep7cPIjImw1kGWdB0KbZSzZUURTNXJCHxCb+hgNS3DahOGJns LVdG6wrS5JDa7ITvuUvd6AY1i854EB2eZt8SFvwV8/gBQYejdx4hW9dWamfTK5N+LlU0an ETvAE78aufo8pgPNTjIJnEdgtjoJ2/fT3G1MjgZCfVcn0WGP5qPPUP5Tb4PjohCLyM8Eif 2ZMNCmaodhNqz32P+APwN0IU9+pJO3kI2DHCWHY1I0+giI+Q+XpmPqmBT9hV3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=kgNmos5P; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.76 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=kgNmos5P; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: DEACD2B0BB X-Spam-Score: -0.76 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: kw4CN0T2LaXx Hello Maxim, On Wed Aug 17, 2022 at 2:16 PM BST, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > So instead of 'unset-value?', I'd use 'value-unset?', but since in this > case we're dealing with a 'maybe' type defined with the 'define-maybe' > macro, I'd keep 'maybe-value-unset?'. How about `unset?` or `maybe-unset?`? (I am a native English speaker, but to be honest I don't think that really matters much to this dicussion...) -- (