From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jelle Licht Subject: bug#31190: Ansible doesn't build Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:44:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87h8oayxum.fsf@lassieur.org> <87k1t5blhp.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114381e0d19bcf056a33c4b7" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f99s2-0000Mi-Dc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:45:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f99ry-00067J-FE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:45:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f99ry-00067D-Ae for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:45:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f99ry-00075g-3U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:45:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87k1t5blhp.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 31190@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur --001a114381e0d19bcf056a33c4b7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" 2018-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Marius Bakke : > Jelle Licht writes: > > > From f770998d0f0b56180e0c9a12f0946a77d7ff61a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Jelle Licht > > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:31:05 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ansible: Add missing inputs > > > > * gnu/packages/admin.scm (ansible)[native-inputs]: Add python2-bcrypt and > > python2-pynacl. > > --- > > gnu/packages/admin.scm | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm > > index aed997e5b..07401af72 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm > > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ > > #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config) > > #:use-module (gnu packages popt) > > #:use-module (gnu packages python) > > + #:use-module (gnu packages password-utils) > > #:use-module (gnu packages python-crypto) > > #:use-module (gnu packages python-web) > > #:use-module (gnu packages terminals) > > This introduces a circular dependency between (gnu packages admin) and > (gnu packages password-utils). Perhaps we should move python-bcrypt to > python-crypto.scm. Thoughts? > Makes sense to me. The `python-py-bcrypt' package is already located there so it would make sense to have similar packages in the same place. --001a114381e0d19bcf056a33c4b7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2018-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com&g= t;:
Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org> writes:

> From f770998d0f0b56180e0c9a12f0946a77d7ff61a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00= 2001
> From: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.o= rg>
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:31:05 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ansible: Add missing inputs
>
> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (ansible)[native-inputs]: Add python2-bcrypt = and
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0python2-pynacl.
> ---
>=C2=A0 gnu/packages/admin.scm | 5 ++++-
>=C2=A0 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
> index aed997e5b..07401af72 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 #:use-module (gnu packages popt)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 #:use-module (gnu packages python)
> +=C2=A0 #:use-module (gnu packages password-utils)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 #:use-module (gnu packages python-crypto)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 #:use-module (gnu packages python-web)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 #:use-module (gnu packages terminals)

This introduces a circular dependency between (gnu packages admin) and
(gnu packages password-utils).=C2=A0 Perhaps we should move python-bcrypt t= o
python-crypto.scm.=C2=A0 Thoughts?

Make= s sense to me. The `python-py-bcrypt' package is already located there<= br>
so it would make sense to have similar packages in the same p= lace.

--001a114381e0d19bcf056a33c4b7--