From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id gBO2EOrW1WFzFgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 18:35:38 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id QAMEDurW1WG00QAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 18:35:38 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEF792BE55 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 18:35:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58478 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5ACG-0001Zz-Qm for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 12:35:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5ABi-0001Zr-1O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 12:35:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5ABh-0007Zh-Nm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 12:35:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n5ABh-0006cp-JU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 12:35:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52908: 'tests/guix-system.sh' fails on aarch64-linux Resent-From: Aiko Kyle Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2022 17:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52908 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Chris Marusich Received: via spool by 52908-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52908.164140406925415 (code B ref 52908); Wed, 05 Jan 2022 17:35:01 +0000 Received: (at 52908) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2022 17:34:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41667 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n5ABA-0006bq-Vz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 12:34:29 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com ([209.85.167.50]:35458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n5ABA-0006be-1v for 52908@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 12:34:28 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id g11so90844386lfu.2 for <52908@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 09:34:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=w2la1ntAZKnH/dAiBlyA9+uRdMN+cNYX/gGOkFZ84rE=; b=ex9WlBBAOV1ba2JBvJxCiOUfA8aW6N7K5eou8OtRuuhC+A2Gx4yu6joTNpvwJ3rJJg 7ZYNI4aDjtPb0Ix2YIeOq1sK4ES/JBO8RjZRgIx+8tX6osmBX2hrRFrTQx46eOzrHAxK tS9dFwMLGs4B64mAWCheg9CzfjIe02IoKxnQVQ3uRkx0Bg5SCeC6xGX3LWmUqgbRu0su r+xGxjYOMIrWhiA6QJ6TxaLGQlvbm3wTpZ7TC0do8Jx4eHa2h+LPf6mTigZoXQ2RAQq+ 1QoVoA5Hka+YPjiGuUtN1zreycN9qg0pvR4s9y+wnO2PSFC7X6CPbad2cm37yTUpxjiA WMVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w2la1ntAZKnH/dAiBlyA9+uRdMN+cNYX/gGOkFZ84rE=; b=z9Bri4Qa2VWbZegqOLppIh/t4AQhEeco+gl4T/1Rtbh1tfIZMgEqsgwhIGi+xpk1qy hgWwpoz28xpYcv6dM0MoWc6RSWUBtql9OqYOhFOamdw4p7QYQm5csj9pc+rUWm2oAZ3s TQ6Ep40uGR7FTRub3kKu8PkHOsQw+lman5KsnG5WTvqU4r0dCENLVFcAlDbLFQFI/usx W8UO6Vpr0HzszDINbqicuTAjguLuufypsmv65JYTGCuY5DdmL2YZcHRqoWcvZZG3vpbj Bg+8Hxe3GlGwMPAi1dx+Sjb0BV6V59CchsTBwI5RNbtuKXrirnrhDmrCR1w2SgmQDXLo ZZHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dZleg5YeWEXgsMcfardCn23+xO3k3PU2sZKInNQjatEdQkcmG 3X/l67iQC2qWD5q8OvHRQNlxezhoWyopDPnTNyc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwG3BYQeW3tjOkMY0cuXSBVV/c9JSwNmjjATI7yiRaAmlY7uWGqSFrz9lc7YE7q3d1rVl1ukgXi/Finsjedr7A= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:ac9:: with SMTP id n9mr46185772lfu.114.1641404062074; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 09:34:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87bl0s5cfx.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnjgqm93.fsf@gmail.com> <878rvua4h8.fsf_-_@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <878rvua4h8.fsf_-_@gmail.com> From: Aiko Kyle Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 10:34:11 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 52908@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1641404137; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=w2la1ntAZKnH/dAiBlyA9+uRdMN+cNYX/gGOkFZ84rE=; b=Lo4Pkypel5g3YU60v8IjFAl0F8dUc1bGx+ksAujmTult1Y8DuwNPfzneAWpH5xW0xrG7YI FeaX4XTQD2J6mcnbL6R7lb4VbQbDMkLzma4rAP635OUyPJ3HICIZoQxq3/SBlL37QaxhDY 5Dv3BHokqBCeWGYDqbUqzQubCGL+GAzS/7vmzaqpa7J/QPP94kferOZs+DMVcGgr0yitPd vTDvT9bmUQcya/bEym+TE/u5NZZc7jV07yo6gsQM3HYTjPJPRnfM4X7YM7k7ECp0FTFx4J o7ah39gAHT9kZN6wxh/vX4bMIKGJD3Hnpngz4qJNFr72Q7R+9ibLBy8zsqejdg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1641404137; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=svbDC8L+oHOR+kaJ3ay/+MA3URMVhUk7/vR2pkub9pimg0SLjAbE1hXIryZnYs6EHoolTX KH4LcTsANGgO5qpmIl9k6LbCPE1IRcUZBfE/XbvTLIHdrGMqLNNUaVqEAmRTKsDjnajJQU y3us+48bVN+2mjQ+CASyWPmsLsdntm2wDiddGAoaYT3c0Fzn6yifO8XsonyDOZv2xNh2t7 CVn1YWY4uQQCVe79GLpe/ChifX9oqwqc4CXJ9clxg3cj6Yav7dvTwSpcGzPe/YcOTMH5RG KIJ9Stp60Bh5CdnR0bmtb8K0E/2ZD4ckzwBaALXSrun54EhgtdwDZmKM+dDBTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ex9WlBBA; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.50 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ex9WlBBA; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BEF792BE55 X-Spam-Score: -0.50 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Y6O47lEVKD+i On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:58 AM Chris Marusich wrote: > > > > It would be great to get this upstreamed soon so I can start guix > > pulling master. I think the guix commit and revision in > > package-management.scm will also need to be bumped after applying this > > fix. > > It shouldn't be necessary to update the guix commit and revision in > package-management.scm. My understanding is that "guix pull" will > install Guix at the specified commit; it does not use the guix package > to decide which version to install. In other words, even if at the > specified commit the "guix" package is defined to use an older version > (I believe this is always the case, actually), it will not stop "guix > pull" from installing Guix at the specified commit. > > If it's necessary to update the "guix" package, we can certainly do it. > However, I don't recall that it's necessary for fixing "guix pull" > problems like this. If you still believe it's necessary, can you help > me to understand why it's necessary? > I actually encountered this issue not doing a "guix pull" but in doing a "guix system reconfigure" after a guix pull. I don't really understand why, but I think guix system reconfigure will continue to fail until the "guix" package is updated. I may be totally incorrect here though as I'm still new to this.