On Sat, 20 Oct 2018, 18:35 Ricardo Wurmus, wrote: > > Hi Laura, > > > I will apply all the changes and send the new version. > > Shall I send the modified patch to the debbugs mail that is in the CC of > > this mail? > > Yes, please. > > >> > > > > + (synopsis "Analysis of Symmetry of Parasitic Infections") > >> > > > > >> > > > Please use lowercase for all words except for the first. CRAN > >> synopses > >> > > > are usually in titlecase and the importer can’t automatically > figure > >> out > >> > > > which words should be converted, so this needs to be done > manually. > >> > > Sorry for this, I just copied the comments in cran's website, I'll change > > that. > > Did you not use the CRAN importer to generate this package definition? > If you did not then you’re in for a treat as “guix import cran -r” can > *recursively* generate package definitions for packages on CRAN, even if > there are dozens of dependencies. > I guess this was my mistake. I did not understand that before. I just used guix import cran for the templates and appended my package with guix edit :/. I will send that fixed. > > >> > > > > + (license license:gpl3))) > >> > > > > >> > > > I checked the source files and noticed that it’s actually GPL 3 or > >> > > > later. Here’s an except from the header of aspi.R: > >> > > I guess this mistake was because in one of the several times of running > > ./pre-inst-env guix build r-aspi I was getting an error about the gpl > > licence. I will change this too. > > If you used the importer this is not your fault. On CRAN the license is > listed as “GPL-3” which the importer turns into “gpl3”. Often people > declare the license as just a single version even though their own > license headers permit later versions. > > PS: please try to reduce the amount of text you quote in replies. It’s > best to only leave the relevant parts that you’re replying to :) > > -- > Ricardo >