Thank you all for the feedback :) I will apply all the changes and send the new version. Shall I send the modified patch to the debbugs mail that is in the CC of this mail? On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 8:48 AM Gábor Boskovits wrote: > Hello guix, > > Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > 20., Szo, 13:05): > > > > Hello Laura, > > > > Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > > 20., Szo, 10:43): > > > > > > Hello Laura, > > > > > > Ricardo Wurmus ezt írta (időpont: 2018. > > > okt. 20., Szo, 10:17): > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Laura, > > > > > > > > congratulations on your first patch to Guix! > > > > > > > > What follows are a few comments on minor changes that I would like to > > > > see before applying the patch to Guix. > > > > > > > > > From 132c8bf1e57f30485e3701ce01ea9d1ac7207e7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > 2001 > > > > > From: laura > > > > > Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:15:37 -0300 > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] I add r-aspi package appended to cran.scm file > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > gnu/packages/cran.scm | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > For commits to Guix, we use a somewhat strict commit message format. > > > > You can take a look at the commit log to get a feel for it. In the > case > > > > of adding r-aspi to cran.scm this would be the expected commit > message: > > > > > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > > > gnu: Add r-aspi. > > > > > > > > * gnu/packages/cran.scm (r-aspi): New variable. > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > > > > > > The first line is always a concise summary. This is followed by a > > > > change log listing modified files and how they were modified. > > > > > > > > > > You can also see git log for examples. > > > > > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/cran.scm b/gnu/packages/cran.scm > > > > > index efcc2dccb..0d8ee6a97 100644 > > > > > --- a/gnu/packages/cran.scm > > > > > +++ b/gnu/packages/cran.scm > > > > > @@ -6256,3 +6256,22 @@ a header row or not. The dataset should > contain > > > > > only one independent variable > > > > > (x) and one dependent variable (y) and can contain a weight for > each > > > > > observation.") > > > > > (license license:gpl2))) > > > > > + > > > > > +(define-public r-aspi > > > > > + (package > > > > > + (name "r-aspi") > > > > > + (version "0.2.0") > > > > > + (source > > > > > + (origin > > > > > + (method url-fetch) > > > > > + (uri (cran-uri "aspi" version)) > > > > > + (sha256 > > > > > + (base32 > > > > > + > "0rhvxw243vvdv3hxa6pi343gcjc2cbxq1jzqirl9k1l4i3897l87")))) > > > > > + (build-system r-build-system) > > > > > + (home-page "https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/aspi/") > > > > > + (synopsis "Analysis of Symmetry of Parasitic Infections") > > > > > > > > Please use lowercase for all words except for the first. CRAN > synopses > > > > are usually in titlecase and the importer can’t automatically figure > out > > > > which words should be converted, so this needs to be done manually. > Sorry for this, I just copied the comments in cran's website, I'll change that. > > > > > > > > > + (description > > > > > + "Tools for the analysis and visualization of bilateral > asymmetry in > > > > > + parasitic infections.") > > > > > > > > Please use a complete sentence for the description. The easiest way > is > > > > probably to just prepend “This package provides”. > > > > > > > > > + (license license:gpl3))) > > > > > > > > I checked the source files and noticed that it’s actually GPL 3 or > > > > later. Here’s an except from the header of aspi.R: > I guess this mistake was because in one of the several times of running ./pre-inst-env guix build r-aspi I was getting an error about the gpl licence. I will change this too. > > > > > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > > > # Analysis of Symmetry of Parasitic Infections is free software: > you can # > > > > # redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU > General Public # > > > > # License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either > version 3 of # > > > > # the License, or (at your option) any later version. > # > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > > > > > > So this really should be “license:gpl3+”. > > > > > > > > (I haven’t tried building the package yet.) > > > > > > > > > > I will try this and report back. > > > > > > > It builds for me fine, so with the suggestions Ricardo mentioned I think > > it is good to go. > > > > > > I think it’s fine to apply the patch with these minor changes. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Ricardo > > > > I had problem with applying this directly with git am, it > > kept telling me the patch is corrupt on line 10. > > Can someone have a look? > > > > My bad, but it seems that at least partially debbugs is responsible for > this, > It broke the long line in the patch, and it simply wrapped it around. I > downloaded the message from there using mbox. As there was no space > before the start of the line, the patch became corrupted. > Do you think this is bug? > I believe debbugs should not alter line endings. > > > > > > > Thanks Ricardo for the fast review! > > > > > > Best regards, > > > g_bor > > > > Best regards, > > g_bor > Best regards, > g_bor > Regards! Laura