[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[Christopher Baines]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 114 bytes --]

I haven't been involved in this branch, but I'm opening the request for
merge issue just to keep track of things.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 987 bytes --]

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

(Cc’ing the Python team.)

Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:

> I haven't been involved in this branch, but I'm opening the request for
> merge issue just to keep track of things.

I haven’t been involved either.  My understanding is that the main
blocker before merging is assessing the amount of breakage introduced in
this branch¹.

Right now it’s built at 89% on x86_64-linux only, which is a bit less
than on ‘master’ but there are still pending builds.  Interested readers
can browse failed builds at:

  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/latest/dashboard?spec=python-team

(If you find builds that failed due to transient errors like the
infamous “missing derivation”, you can click on “Action -> Restart”—this
is now available in most cases without privileges.)

An important issue seems to be test failures of ‘python-responses’:

  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/4738398/details

Excerpt:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::test_auto_calculate_content_length_doesnt_override_existing_value
FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::TestMaxRetry::test_max_retries - Ty...
FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::TestMaxRetry::test_max_retries_exceed[True]
FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::TestMaxRetry::test_max_retries_exceed[False]
FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::TestMaxRetry::test_max_retries_exceed_msg
FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::TestMaxRetry::test_adapter_retry_untouched
============ 6 failed, 187 passed, 2 skipped, 20 warnings in 21.86s ============
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Ideas, Pythonistas?  :-)

Ludo’.

¹ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-05/msg00227.html

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[Sharlatan Hellseher]

Hi,

All failed tests have the same reason:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
        adapter = requests.adapters.HTTPAdapter(
>           max_retries=Retry(
                total=total,
                backoff_factor=0.1,
                status_forcelist=[500],
                method_whitelist=["GET", "POST", "PATCH"],
                raise_on_status=raise_on_status,
            )
        )
E       TypeError: Retry.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument
'method_whitelist'
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

It looks like the bump to the latest version would resolve it 0.22.0 -> 0.25.2

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guix refresh --list-dependent python-responses
Building the following 198 packages would ensure 456 dependent
packages are rebuilt: <...>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

There are some mentioned in GitHub issues with the same simptoms:
https://github.com/GeneralMills/pytrends/issues/591
https://github.com/jamalex/notion-py/issues/386

On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 at 15:27, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> (Cc’ing the Python team.)
>
> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:
>
> > I haven't been involved in this branch, but I'm opening the request for
> > merge issue just to keep track of things.
>
> I haven’t been involved either.  My understanding is that the main
> blocker before merging is assessing the amount of breakage introduced in
> this branch¹.
>
> Right now it’s built at 89% on x86_64-linux only, which is a bit less
> than on ‘master’ but there are still pending builds.  Interested readers
> can browse failed builds at:
>
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/latest/dashboard?spec=python-team
>
> (If you find builds that failed due to transient errors like the
> infamous “missing derivation”, you can click on “Action -> Restart”—this
> is now available in most cases without privileges.)
>
> An important issue seems to be test failures of ‘python-responses’:
>
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/4738398/details
>
> Excerpt:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> =========================== short test summary info ============================
> FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::test_auto_calculate_content_length_doesnt_override_existing_value
> FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::TestMaxRetry::test_max_retries - Ty...
> FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::TestMaxRetry::test_max_retries_exceed[True]
> FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::TestMaxRetry::test_max_retries_exceed[False]
> FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::TestMaxRetry::test_max_retries_exceed_msg
> FAILED responses/tests/test_responses.py::TestMaxRetry::test_adapter_retry_untouched
> ============ 6 failed, 187 passed, 2 skipped, 20 warnings in 21.86s ============
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Ideas, Pythonistas?  :-)
>
> Ludo’.
>
> ¹ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-05/msg00227.html



-- 
VCS: https://github.incerto.xyz/; https://git.sr.ht/~hellseher/
GPG: 9847 81DE 689C 21C2 6418 0867 76D7 27BF F62C D2B5

… наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна
найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но
совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости.

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[jgart via Guix-patches via]

Hi Python Team, Guix Team at large, and Parenphilic Pythonistas,

This long lived python-team branch as of today has a lot of git conflicts if you try to rebase and/or merge it on to master.

What do you think if we discuss an alternative team branch policy for the future for feature branches that target master?

Here's a tentative proposal, with an example: 

Instead of having a single python-team branch, with a wide variety of new Python features, what if we had, a python-team feature branch that we work on relatively quickly?

In other words, we avoid long lived branches but try to merge for example, a new python-team-sphinx branch as soon as the "Sphinx feature" is ready. This python-team-sphinx branch will only contain the work required to bump sphinx to the latest version that we'd like to support. The reason I use python-sphinx as an example is because the python-sphinx package requires a lot of rebuilds across many language ecosystems that use Sphinx for documentation purposes. 

I think that keeping the team branches focused on a particular team sub-feature within that team's scope and not using long-lived and largely scoped branches will avoid a ton of frustration trying to fix merge conflicts when/before we announce a request to merge.

We can then focus our focused efforts on iterating over preparing major Python features and packages that require large amounts rebuilds.

WDYT?

jgart

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[Tanguy LE CARROUR]

Hi jgart,

Quoting jgart (2024-06-18 22:46:47)
> This long lived python-team branch as of today has a lot of git conflicts if
> you try to rebase and/or merge it on to master.
> […]
> Here's a tentative proposal, with an example: 
> […]
> I think that keeping the team branches focused on a particular team
> sub-feature within that team's scope and not using long-lived and largely
> scoped branches will avoid a ton of frustration trying to fix merge conflicts
> when/before we announce a request to merge.
> 
> We can then focus our focused efforts on iterating over preparing major Python
> features and packages that require large amounts rebuilds.

IM(V)HO… the smaller and the more-frequently-rebased the branches, the better!
I still haven’t wrapped my head around the consequences for the CI of rebasing
often —can a simple rebase trigger a world rebuild?—, but this is definitively
something that I do —quite successfully!— on a daily basis in my professional life.

I guess it’s just a matter of giving it a try and see? It’s always possible to
go back to the one-branch-to-rule-them-all `python-team` branch if managing
multiple branches ends up being a pain, right?

I also have no clue how the other teams are managing their branch and their
rebase/merge policy?

-- 
Tanguy

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[Christopher Baines]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1845 bytes --]

"jgart" <jgart@dismail.de> writes:

> Hi Python Team, Guix Team at large, and Parenphilic Pythonistas,
>
> This long lived python-team branch as of today has a lot of git
> conflicts if you try to rebase and/or merge it on to master.
>
> What do you think if we discuss an alternative team branch policy for
> the future for feature branches that target master?
>
> Here's a tentative proposal, with an example: 
>
> Instead of having a single python-team branch, with a wide variety of
> new Python features, what if we had, a python-team feature branch that
> we work on relatively quickly?
>
> In other words, we avoid long lived branches but try to merge for
> example, a new python-team-sphinx branch as soon as the "Sphinx
> feature" is ready. This python-team-sphinx branch will only contain
> the work required to bump sphinx to the latest version that we'd like
> to support. The reason I use python-sphinx as an example is because
> the python-sphinx package requires a lot of rebuilds across many
> language ecosystems that use Sphinx for documentation purposes.
>
> I think that keeping the team branches focused on a particular team
> sub-feature within that team's scope and not using long-lived and
> largely scoped branches will avoid a ton of frustration trying to fix
> merge conflicts when/before we announce a request to merge.

This aligns with the current (and previous) guidance on managing
branches [1]. Providing there's a consistent topic for the branch, any
name is fine (e.g. python-team-sphinx is fine).

1: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Managing-Patches-and-Branches.html

I'm also hoping the requirement to create a guix-patches issue
requesting to merge the branch when it's created will help avoid the
long lived branches that we've had over the last year.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 987 bytes --]

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[jgart via Guix-patches via]

> This aligns with the current (and previous) guidance on managing
> 
> branches [1]. Providing there's a consistent topic for the branch, any
> 
> name is fine (e.g. python-team-sphinx is fine).

Hi Christopher, 

That's great that my proposal already aligns with the current guidance.

I am going to try to start cherry picking uncontroversial and non failing patches on the python-team branch on to master and removing them from the python-team branch in order to reduce the size of the branch. I can then remove those commits from the python-team branch and force push to update it. What do you think of this approach before I attempt it? I'll wait on your guidance before doing this.

Another approach I can take is to break the branch apart into 2 or 3 smaller topic branches and make requests for those branches to merge one at a time.

Note that I have an underpowered old Thinkpad X230 laptop and will only be able to test branches that are not too large. I tried using QA/CI but it seemed to be in an unknown state the last time that I tried. Any suggestions here for how to more effectively use that QA/CI infrastructure would be much appreciated.

I tried spending a bit of time on trying to resolve the merge conflicts but it quickly lead down a long rabbit hole and I only have a limited time to fix so many merge conflicts. The process is also currently very tedious to do with high amounts of accuracy due to their being

1. Lots of commits that I am not familiar
2. Lots of commits
3. The branch has diverged alot since latest master so things don't cleanly apply anymore

What do you think of this current approach of cherry picking good commits off of the python-team branch in order to reduce the size?

Another issue that I ran into on the branch is that there are commits that are failing. For example, at commit fdef5662cce6a57aa6bfa682c7260b65ce3669b8 (the borgmatic changes), borgmatic fails. Should I remove this commit since it is broken?

all the best,

jgart

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[Sharlatan Hellseher via Guix-patches]

Hi,

@jgart Please let me know if you need a quick test of changes, I've got some
computer recourses at home.

Thanks
Oleg

On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 18:04, jgart <jgart@dismail.de> wrote:
>
> > This aligns with the current (and previous) guidance on managing
> >
> > branches [1]. Providing there's a consistent topic for the branch, any
> >
> > name is fine (e.g. python-team-sphinx is fine).
>
> Hi Christopher,
>
> That's great that my proposal already aligns with the current guidance.
>
> I am going to try to start cherry picking uncontroversial and non failing patches on the python-team branch on to master and removing them from the python-team branch in order to reduce the size of the branch. I can then remove those commits from the python-team branch and force push to update it. What do you think of this approach before I attempt it? I'll wait on your guidance before doing this.
>
> Another approach I can take is to break the branch apart into 2 or 3 smaller topic branches and make requests for those branches to merge one at a time.
>
> Note that I have an underpowered old Thinkpad X230 laptop and will only be able to test branches that are not too large. I tried using QA/CI but it seemed to be in an unknown state the last time that I tried. Any suggestions here for how to more effectively use that QA/CI infrastructure would be much appreciated.
>
> I tried spending a bit of time on trying to resolve the merge conflicts but it quickly lead down a long rabbit hole and I only have a limited time to fix so many merge conflicts. The process is also currently very tedious to do with high amounts of accuracy due to their being
>
> 1. Lots of commits that I am not familiar
> 2. Lots of commits
> 3. The branch has diverged alot since latest master so things don't cleanly apply anymore
>
> What do you think of this current approach of cherry picking good commits off of the python-team branch in order to reduce the size?
>
> Another issue that I ran into on the branch is that there are commits that are failing. For example, at commit fdef5662cce6a57aa6bfa682c7260b65ce3669b8 (the borgmatic changes), borgmatic fails. Should I remove this commit since it is broken?
>
> all the best,
>
> jgart



-- 
VCS: https://github.incerto.xyz/; https://git.sr.ht/~hellseher/
GPG: 9847 81DE 689C 21C2 6418 0867 76D7 27BF F62C D2B5

… наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна
найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но
совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости.

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[Lars-Dominik Braun]

Hi,

> I am going to try to start cherry picking uncontroversial and non failing patches on the python-team branch on to master and removing them from the python-team branch in order to reduce the size of the branch. I can then remove those commits from the python-team branch and force push to update it. What do you think of this approach before I attempt it? I'll wait on your guidance before doing this.

please go ahead. Divide and conquer is imo a good approach to get this branch merged. 

> Another approach I can take is to break the branch apart into 2 or 3 smaller topic branches and make requests for those branches to merge one at a time.

I’m splitting of the build-system-related changes into the
pyproject-build-system branch (again), because these are relatively
self-contained and thus easy to merge into master.

Lars

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[Christopher Baines]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3011 bytes --]

"jgart" <jgart@dismail.de> writes:

>> This aligns with the current (and previous) guidance on managing
>> branches [1]. Providing there's a consistent topic for the branch, any
>> name is fine (e.g. python-team-sphinx is fine).
>
> That's great that my proposal already aligns with the current guidance.
>
> I am going to try to start cherry picking uncontroversial and non
> failing patches on the python-team branch on to master and removing
> them from the python-team branch in order to reduce the size of the
> branch. I can then remove those commits from the python-team branch
> and force push to update it. What do you think of this approach before
> I attempt it? I'll wait on your guidance before doing this.
>
> Another approach I can take is to break the branch apart into 2 or 3
> smaller topic branches and make requests for those branches to merge
> one at a time.

If there are commits on the branch that have been submitted as patches,
you might just be able to look at pushing them to master. If there are
commits that haven't been submitted as patches yet, but could be pushed
to master, it would be good to send them as patches so that QA can take
a look.

And splitting off some commits in to a more specific branch is fine as
well.

> Note that I have an underpowered old Thinkpad X230 laptop and will
> only be able to test branches that are not too large. I tried using
> QA/CI but it seemed to be in an unknown state the last time that I
> tried. Any suggestions here for how to more effectively use that QA/CI
> infrastructure would be much appreciated.

QA has been performing recently as it's taking too long to process
revisions. Let me know if things aren't working or if you have questions
though and I can try and help.

> I tried spending a bit of time on trying to resolve the merge
> conflicts but it quickly lead down a long rabbit hole and I only have
> a limited time to fix so many merge conflicts. The process is also
> currently very tedious to do with high amounts of accuracy due to
> their being
>
> 1. Lots of commits that I am not familiar
> 2. Lots of commits
> 3. The branch has diverged alot since latest master so things don't cleanly apply anymore
>
> What do you think of this current approach of cherry picking good
> commits off of the python-team branch in order to reduce the size?

I think making sure commits that can go to master, do go to master, is
really helpful to avoid merge conflicts. It's so much more likely to
have conflicts if there are changes that can be made on master, but are
made on a branch, or changes that should be made on a branch but are
pushed to master.

> Another issue that I ran into on the branch is that there are commits
> that are failing. For example, at commit
> fdef5662cce6a57aa6bfa682c7260b65ce3669b8 (the borgmatic changes),
> borgmatic fails. Should I remove this commit since it is broken?

While ideally we'd care about the state at each commit, this doesn't
really happen so it's up to you what you do there.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 987 bytes --]

[bug#71408] Postpone?

[Andreas Enge]

This branch is first now on the waiting list of QA:
   https://qa.guix.gnu.org/
but it has not been touched since May, and in particular not been
rebased on master after the core-updates merge. This is reflected
in the QA message:
   https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/python-team
   "Unable to check changes between branch and master.
   Merge base is not a commit known to the data service."

Should we close this issue now and let the branch take the back of the
queue? I see build farm activity around commit e4ad2f178af65be6c8ca6e98a667787674cd8c82,
the latest one in this branch, which looks like a waste of scarce build
power (especially on aarch64) to me. And it holds up the r-team branch
described as ready to merge.

Andreas

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[Steve George]

On 25 Jun, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> @jgart Please let me know if you need a quick test of changes, I've got some
> computer recourses at home.
(...) 

Hi,

I started breaking the branch down into small parts. Oleg (or someone else) can you review and push them for me please?

They all build against current master (b7c94d528875415ea7ec6225d88a6b3d55fa2e14)

I pushed it to a branch (python-team-71408-pt1) here:

git clone https://git.sdf.org/futurile/guix-play/ --branch python-team-71408-pt1

Stack is: 

python-pygments@2.15.1:  1ff7dfeab65c27bff1ddd0694b5c16c648a0cd0b
python-imagesizei@1.4.1:  93d627adccf07e57a36a8b0a5ad6ba3878814820
python-sphinx-alabaster-theme@0.7.13  126d3223f4687c8319fc386481714c5c17227c42
python-typing-extensions@4.10.0  175eea0d091d80f36a468c2154196a79c7d83148
Add setuptools/wheels to packages  549efcb63714a8715a81e3944de94e7a7d337d7d
python-sphinx@6.2.1 fd577e065c48c06083b8e1eeebc6cc86a7238ffb
  - please look at this one as I had to adjust the tests a lot
  - might be a mistake 
python-markdown-it-py@3.0.0  160f89e8a18c0bf21b232df2d10ff725068a54b2
python-mdit-py-plugins@0.4.0  717ba970f2924c41a315c8bdc7994fbbba98475a
python-argcomplete@3.2.2  f5fa5f549cd88c5b31262e30bf90f426b89793f4
python-traitlets@5.14.1  839057dcfed27a109d3c9daadf320d3a7bff2ae6
python-ipython@8.22.1  406e3b159cccb7a79370205767e55e5c27a395df
  - requires python-trailets to work
python-nbconvert  569256f3e6b7e5bcca891123039db3a26c23b0ce
python-jupytext@1.15.0   59ee791c6223761dd467642a0236c6a99200e32d
python-sphinx-pytest@0.2.0  99e8317bce68fd001f1a20980d8489d7b027be60
python-eventlet@0.35.2  a7ee6d91c81a1b9144811b175aad0e758a9fb03c
python-argcomplete  1b588a1baf5d78713d35fd074c4792c972164f95
  - fix-up of earlier commit
python-pynacl  7d11cf28bbc6158b971bedb03fa77e3d7cf41940
python-pytest-arraydiff  86144159f36602f17b5808a2276f6fd23fcd7db9
python-itemloaders  b548cfd67124fcc75d2f0f4f19d1ebbc3e1ad884 
python-misteltoe  25d27be8a937d4fef31af8c5ca87286fa8599485
python-vine  484ad0ee5f3e3a77454aa816585e527b70b41a09
python-joblib  2499d3143cae865839231113012642a60272c2a8

Not working for me - would love help with:

- meson-python  86631897caa19606c407729818c21229f44ed947
    - failing for me on master and this fails

- python-rich@13.7.0  b8e3e0e4d42cdaf9b48aecb0e0660493fa4f8b1b
    - it needed python-nbconvert.
    - still fails but now on a bunch of API tests
    - hmm python-ipython master is failing to build for me

- python-textual@0.50.1  d3604f1c9898e79d9d6c5cad06bb06358f78a25f
    - needs python-rich

- python-myst-parser ab9c7c535403b7e813a44e56d8cce63afd5b8588
   - it fails test_basic.py - needs a python build system change from earlier?

- python-lightning-cloud  2ef5b0b85bba0cda2be8f0b6ab6146e9bc194922
    - fails due to python-rich failing

- python-rapidfizz@3.6.1  fa6755520c8e09969aef693b0ab884deac6a0343
    - fails - unclear why

- python-cleo@2.1.0  082a2d43a8b850e73e07d07a61f70cae3a3a0428
    - requires python-rapid-fuzz

- python-packaging-bootstrap  39fc22f3dccc1f34c83c7469ded91bcd5d32d35d
    - fails - complains about a dependency cycle

- python-pycurl  94f54d29eb104d750d6d77b93d9e00e8f0937350
  - fails a test

Python build system changes - not cherry-picked: 

- 2a06463c6ad41b2d37285988f05e9d7b5fad2d32
- 4ce43dd688dc0d6471ce9b2ed10732e235a5f12c
- fb70a545ad2b494f39ae7d22e205759702006e10
- d383150bd9ded7cc2f1b976ae4a833d6b05924f5
- 0a20b52b44600fed9948865ae45a06a52b8386b8
- cb5f963e7a270a973bcb1850136df2e358a0e75a
- a688230bc25dea5b3c0ff1f1de80dc02e6afd80b
- ee1cacdda4627798930a1ffe8eb4030b940b4030
- c955dd1e732c7abee0a8a598e57f11e564735383
- 6c2090169ba9495deb15734227925b8faf9bbca9
- a436de1fb9dd063f3c61aa5b36fe4e31cbef9048
- fd577e065c48c06083b8e1eeebc6cc86a7238ffb
- df580a54f49ddc5d7aa99992916f4537f48df48d

Thanks,

Futurile / Steve

[bug#71408] Request for merging "python-team" branch

[Arseniy Zaostrovnykh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 222 bytes --]

Hello!
I am interested in merging this branch. Unfortunately, I've got near zero
experience contributing to guix.

Is there any task not on the critical path that I could help with?

--
Respectfully,
Arseniy (a.k.a necto)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 406 bytes --]

[bug#71408] Update on Python team pt1

[Steve George]

Hi,

I've pushed 31 commits to:

git clone https://git.sdf.org/futurile/guix-play/ --branch python-team-71408-pt1

As I don't think anyone has pulled from it I force pushed it an hour ago.

The cherry-picked commits are:

Python-pygments@2.15.1:  1ff7dfeab65c27bff1ddd0694b5c16c648a0cd0b
python-imagesizei@1.4.1:  93d627adccf07e57a36a8b0a5ad6ba3878814820
python-sphinx-alabaster-theme@0.7.13  126d3223f4687c8319fc386481714c5c17227c42
python-typing-extensions@4.10.0  175eea0d091d80f36a468c2154196a79c7d83148
Add setuptools/wheels to packages  549efcb63714a8715a81e3944de94e7a7d337d7d
python-sphinx@6.2.1 fd577e065c48c06083b8e1eeebc6cc86a7238ffb
python-markdown-it-py@3.0.0  160f89e8a18c0bf21b232df2d10ff725068a54b2
python-mdit-py-plugins@0.4.0  717ba970f2924c41a315c8bdc7994fbbba98475a
python-pytest-mypy-testing@0.1.2  e2745702b79702a928241545b83169bb748aa9a9
python-argcomplete@3.2.2  f5fa5f549cd88c5b31262e30bf90f426b89793f4
python-traitlets@5.14.1  839057dcfed27a109d3c9daadf320d3a7bff2ae6
python-prompt-toolkit@3.0.43  557aa4792136e860e3f8e28dc25527591d28b3ab
python-ipython@8.22.1  406e3b159cccb7a79370205767e55e5c27a395df
  - requires traitlets
python-nbconvert  569256f3e6b7e5bcca891123039db3a26c23b0ce
  - was higher up; needed by python-rich
python-jupytext@1.15.0   59ee791c6223761dd467642a0236c6a99200e32d
python-sphinx-pytest@0.2.0  99e8317bce68fd001f1a20980d8489d7b027be60
  - was higher up; 
python-readme-render@37.2  b1fbfe5b55b85e44d4f3e60c3ae6ec9bff71bf11
python-eventlet@0.35.2  a7ee6d91c81a1b9144811b175aad0e758a9fb03c
python-argcomplete  1b588a1baf5d78713d35fd074c4792c972164f95
python-pynacl  7d11cf28bbc6158b971bedb03fa77e3d7cf41940
python-pytest-arraydiff  86144159f36602f17b5808a2276f6fd23fcd7db9
python-itemloaders  b548cfd67124fcc75d2f0f4f19d1ebbc3e1ad884
python-misteltoe  25d27be8a937d4fef31af8c5ca87286fa8599485
python-vine  484ad0ee5f3e3a77454aa816585e527b70b41a09
python-joblib  2499d3143cae865839231113012642a60272c2a8
python-box  dd8f10fd79946e8f6f2f1613317a5a8d9e527d32
futurile-python-pytdata-sphinx-theme-fix 071e5e1ca795b2a5dacd46c0da05f57385220046
futurile-python-certauth-fix  c390ac8aeb13e4ed565d52d521d09752ce318e07
  - need help with this as I can't figure out why it's failing
gnu-python-attrs-Update-to  fabbb32638813b944b9da3749599fac6eed4221c
  - 2130 package rebuilds
  - have built about 100 - better to rebuild after python-rich
python-rich@13.8.1  611b7257463e9a0b757aee492ab54dda33a5ebe8
    - NEW - combines two patches
    - b8e3e0e4d42cdaf9b48aecb0e0660493fa4f8b1b
    - bf18849eda26f83fec42124c95b652c1aaa77f15
python-textual@0.50.1  d3604f1c9898e79d9d6c5cad06bb06358f78a25f
    - python-rich wants 350 packages rebuild - done about 30

Not working (for me):
---------------------

- meson-python  86631897caa19606c407729818c21229f44ed947
- python-pycurl  94f54d29eb104d750d6d77b93d9e00e8f0937350
  - another ceert fail, as is certauth
- python-packaging-bootstrap  39fc22f3dccc1f34c83c7469ded91bcd5d32d35d
  - complains about a dependency cycle
  - https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/4322844/details - SUCCESS on python-team!
  - fails for me
- python-cleo@2.1.0  082a2d43a8b850e73e07d07a61f70cae3a3a0428
  - requires rapidfuzz
- python-rapidfuzz@3.6.1  fa6755520c8e09969aef693b0ab884deac6a0343
  - https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/4738134/details -> python-scikit-build
- python-myst-parser ab9c7c535403b7e813a44e56d8cce63afd5b8588
  - https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/4737838/details
  - fails

Pyproject build-system (not cherrypicked)
------------------------------------------

- 2a06463c6ad41b2d37285988f05e9d7b5fad2d32
- 4ce43dd688dc0d6471ce9b2ed10732e235a5f12c
- fb70a545ad2b494f39ae7d22e205759702006e10
- d383150bd9ded7cc2f1b976ae4a833d6b05924f5
- 0a20b52b44600fed9948865ae45a06a52b8386b8
- cb5f963e7a270a973bcb1850136df2e358a0e75a
- a688230bc25dea5b3c0ff1f1de80dc02e6afd80b
- ee1cacdda4627798930a1ffe8eb4030b940b4030
- c955dd1e732c7abee0a8a598e57f11e564735383
- 6c2090169ba9495deb15734227925b8faf9bbca9
- a436de1fb9dd063f3c61aa5b36fe4e31cbef9048
- fd577e065c48c06083b8e1eeebc6cc86a7238ffb
- df580a54f49ddc5d7aa99992916f4537f48df48d

Next steps
-----------
The ones I've cherry-picked are all from the 'start' of the branch.
I'm still rebuilding the python-attrs & python-rich dependents.
For now, it doesn't look like these are making things worse.

I will create another small branch 'stacked' on top of this one, to continue testing.

Futurile / Steve

bug#71408: Postpone?

[Andreas Enge]

Hello,

Am Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 11:09:23AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> Should we close this issue now and let the branch take the back of the
> queue?

the Bordeaux build farm is mostly idle now, so I will go ahead and close
this bug, in the hope that the next waiting branch will be started.
If this does not work, we can still reopen it.

And I think you can continue discussion in this bug even if it is closed.

Andreas