From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40337) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC39H-0001gl-Cy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:43:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC39D-0005AS-6y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:43:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC39C-0005AD-Nn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:43:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC39C-0001zX-DO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:43:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#32933] [PATCH] guix: add license prefix hackage imports Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87h8hri9sj.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7nioqk6.fsf@elephly.net> <877eijljkf.fsf@gnu.org> <87va63mthl.fsf@elephly.net> In-Reply-To: <87va63mthl.fsf@elephly.net> From: Joe Hillenbrand Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 06:42:36 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dec7620578449c9a" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 32933@debbugs.gnu.org --000000000000dec7620578449c9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 02:49 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > > > > For the sake of consistency though, it may be best to do it for all the > > importers, if we were to take that route. > > Adding the same prefix to all importers sounds good to me. > Should I create a patch for each importer or do them all in one patch? > --000000000000dec7620578449c9a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, = Oct 15, 2018, 02:49 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
> For the sake of consistency though, it may be best to do it for all th= e
> importers, if we were to take that route.

Adding the same prefix to all importers sounds good to me.
=

Should I create a= patch for each importer or do them all in one patch?
--000000000000dec7620578449c9a--