On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 02:49 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
> For the sake of consistency though, it may be best to do it for all the
> importers, if we were to take that route.

Adding the same prefix to all importers sounds good to me.

Should I create a patch for each importer or do them all in one patch?