From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3idX-0007aG-Tm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:35:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3idS-0008K6-Bo for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:35:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44186) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3idS-0008Je-7Y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:35:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3idR-00062A-T4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:35:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26524: Add conda and dependencies Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87tw5fs1ii.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87tw5fs1ii.fsf@elephly.net> From: Frederick Muriithi Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:34:23 +0300 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 26524@debbugs.gnu.org On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > > I=E2=80=99m not sure that the strict version requirements are actually > reasonable. Instead of packaging older versions it may make more sense > to patch away the version range from the setup.py files. > Okay. Thanks. I will fix the issues, and resend the patches, but I think this time, each patch in a separate email of its own, to make it easier to track. Thanks for the feedback.