From: Paul Alesius <paul@unnservice.com>
To: 55055@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#55055] Fwd: [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 22:41:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL8jUGV9v_G=CoSJbXeXMn2DCL-=-Z-J8THJQ5G4RpTnAyXZyA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL8jUGUyedoy+9va2qGJR5QpXn5B6cn7dWODyBJ0kxq1HQ+GYQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3075 bytes --]
> Also, #f is not a string, did you mean ‘;#f|string’?
The idea behind #f is that the field is optional, so that if it isn't
specified in the configuration then it isn't written to the configuration
file at all, hence #f is for a conditional when writing the actual
configuration file and has no default value.
> * Could the security limitation be documented?
> * Does wireguard has some inclusion mechanism, such that the wireguard
configuration can ‘include’ some file outside the store?
I'll fix it properly to allow for loading of a key file, WireGuard does not
have an inclusion mechanism. How does it work with regards to documentation
and i18n versions, do you use online translation for the other languages? I
can really only fill in the english version.
> * What security impact does a leaked secret key have?
Minimal to none, one should worry about the cloud peers over the wire guard
pre-shared key. It's just an additional layer of security in case the
public key algorithms are broken (for instance with quantum decryption),
then the pre-shared key functions as a one-time pad. If none is specified,
wireguard will use a default one of an all-zero string.
Since countries log all traffic, you never know what they have, hence my
patch submission.
> * WDYT of verifying that the preshared key looks ‘reasonable’ (I guess
only a-z0-9 characters, no spaces or newlines, not a bytevector ...)
I could develop a subsystem for validating the fields of the wireguard but
isn't it better to provide validations from the guix framework more
broadly? With my level of Guile scripting right now, I doubt that it would
be accepted.
With regards,
- Paul
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 at 16:26, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
> Paul Alesius schreef op do 21-04-2022 om 15:26 [+0200]:
> > + (preshared-key wireguard-peer-preshared-key
> > + (default #f)) ;string
>
> This should be documented in the documentation, otherwise it will be
> difficult to discover. Also, #f is not a string, did you mean
> ‘;#f|string’?
>
> Also, a limitation: the preshared key will end up in the store, and
> hence be world-readable. So other users on the same system (other
> people or compromised system daemons) could now determine the preshared
> key.
>
> Questions:
>
> * Could the security limitation be documented?
>
> * What security impact does a leaked secret key have?
>
> * Does wireguard has some inclusion mechanism, such that the
> wireguard configuration can ‘include’ some file outside the store?
>
> * WDYT of verifying that the preshared key looks ‘reasonable’
> (I guess only a-z0-9 characters, no spaces or newlines, not a
> bytevector ...)
>
> As-is, if I do (preshared-keys (string->utf8 "oops I thought this
> needs to be bytevector)) then "guix system reconfigure" doesn't
> give a nice error message, it will just silently produce a broken
> configuration file.
>
> Greetings,
> Maxime.
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3821 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-21 13:26 [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey Paul Alesius
2022-04-21 14:25 ` Maxime Devos
[not found] ` <CAL8jUGUyedoy+9va2qGJR5QpXn5B6cn7dWODyBJ0kxq1HQ+GYQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-04-21 20:41 ` Paul Alesius [this message]
2022-04-21 21:55 ` [bug#55055] Fwd: " Maxime Devos
2022-04-21 21:59 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-21 21:48 ` Maxime Devos
2022-12-26 16:53 ` bug#55055: " Mathieu Othacehe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAL8jUGV9v_G=CoSJbXeXMn2DCL-=-Z-J8THJQ5G4RpTnAyXZyA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=paul@unnservice.com \
--cc=55055@debbugs.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.