From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amirouche Boubekki Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add scheme-bytestructures Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:14:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87fuo4hz3c.fsf@openmailbox.org> <8760p0gcer.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c67da379cbe053f237907 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwUE4-0003dX-2W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:14:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwUE3-0005Or-3K for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:14:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8760p0gcer.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= , Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel --089e013c67da379cbe053f237907 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:46 PM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi Amirouche, [...] > >> + (scm-files (string-split > "bytestructures/guile/explicit-endianness.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/numeric-metadata.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/ffi.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/vector.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/union.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/numeric-all.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/utils.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/pointer.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/base.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/numeric.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/struct.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile/bitfields.scm > >> +bytestructures/r6/bytevectors.scm > >> +bytestructures/body/base.syntactic.scm > >> +bytestructures/body/explicit-endianness.scm > >> +bytestructures/body/vector.scm > >> +bytestructures/body/union.scm > >> +bytestructures/body/utils.scm > >> +bytestructures/body/base.scm > >> +bytestructures/body/numeric.scm > >> +bytestructures/body/struct.scm > >> +bytestructures/body/bitfields.scm > >> +bytestructures/guile.scm" > > Please let=E2=80=99s not list all the files. :-) Could it instead use > something like (find-files "bytestructures" "\\.scm$")? > The above is a subset of all files. Do you prefer to use `find-files` and exclude some files? Regards, Amirouche --089e013c67da379cbe053f237907 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon= , Oct 10, 2016 at 10:46 PM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 (scm-files (string-spli= t "bytestructures/guile/explicit-endianness.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/numeric-metadata.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/ffi.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/vector.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/union.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/numeric-all.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/utils.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/pointer.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/base.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/numeric.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/struct.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile/bitfields.scm
>> +bytestructures/r6/bytevectors.scm
>> +bytestructures/body/base.syntactic.scm
>> +bytestructures/body/explicit-endianness.scm
>> +bytestructures/body/vector.scm
>> +bytestructures/body/union.scm
>> +bytestructures/body/utils.scm
>> +bytestructures/body/base.scm
>> +bytestructures/body/numeric.scm
>> +bytestructures/body/struct.scm
>> +bytestructures/body/bitfields.scm
>> +bytestructures/guile.scm"

Please let=E2=80=99s not list all the files.=C2=A0 :-)=C2=A0 Could it inste= ad use
something like (find-files "bytestructures" "\\.scm$")?=

The above is a sub= set of all files. Do you prefer to use `find-files` and exclude some files?=

Regards,

Amirouche
--089e013c67da379cbe053f237907--