From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] gnu: mutter: Update to HEAD.
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:57:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAL1_imnzvb7OqZ0z8VdMQr3wi+THjpgBArNMEkP5-yq0j4vdHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170201233531.2640-1-david@craven.ch> <87h943xq5l.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51307)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1cbs2K-0004iy-IZ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 11:57:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1cbs2H-0006AS-FT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 11:57:36 -0500
Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]:35838)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1cbs2H-0006AG-AD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 11:57:33 -0500
Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id x49so9623761qtc.2
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:57:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87h943xq5l.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

> I think relying on unreleased software is fine when that is known to fix
> security issues.  In other cases, we should stick to upstream releases
> IMO: it=E2=80=99s upstream=E2=80=99s job to decide when a commit can be c=
onsidered a
> release.

It's the 3.22.2 branch so it contains only backported bugfixes. Arch
linux does the same...