From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Craven Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] gnu: xorg: Add lndir. Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:35:38 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40819) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZwKA-0004Wo-7C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 04:35:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZwK6-0006c9-1H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 04:35:45 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::244]:33747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZwK4-0006bU-Ln for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 04:35:41 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-x244.google.com with SMTP id z8so4956247ywa.0 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 01:35:39 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel , Alex Kost > The patch looks good to me, except the indentation of this > > (string-append ...). I usually write 'source' fields like this: > > (source (origin > (method url-fetch) > (uri (string-append "mirror://xorg/individual/util/lndir-" > version ".tar.bz2")) > (sha256 > (base32 > "0pdngiy8zdhsiqx2am75yfcl36l7kd7d7nl0rss8shcdvsqgmx29")))) > > But this is not a big deal, of course :-) I prefer (uri (string-append "mirror://xorg/individual/util/" "lndir-" version ".tar.bz2")) But in this case I thought that keeping consistent with how it was done in the xorg.scm file was more important than my preference. What do you think?