From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Craven Subject: Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field. Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 14:12:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160805145804.26753-1-david@craven.ch> <87y44af52m.fsf@gmail.com> <87shuit01e.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg60g79l.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWMwf-0000HY-OX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 08:12:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWMwa-0005IM-Gm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 08:12:44 -0400 Received: from mail-yb0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c09::233]:35768) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWMwZ-0005HN-9V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 08:12:40 -0400 Received: by mail-yb0-x233.google.com with SMTP id g133so27895216ybf.2 for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 05:12:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mathieu Lirzin Cc: guix-devel , Alex Kost > My point is that if we are giving a direct link to the non-patched > source in our UI, the FSDG issue is the same. Just because I can't understand the concern, doesn't necessarily mean that it isn't a valid one...