From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Craven Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] gnu: vlc: Fix regression caused by update to qt 5.7. Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 01:19:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160820215957.GA6502@jasmine> <20160821140825.13048-1-david@craven.ch> <20160821140825.13048-11-david@craven.ch> <874m6ddgtf.fsf@netris.org> <20160821231658.GB4548@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbc1I-0002r3-Is for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:19:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbc1E-0004u0-Hg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:19:12 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::244]:34973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbc1D-0004tu-AW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:19:08 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-x244.google.com with SMTP id r9so2977893ywg.2 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:19:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160821231658.GB4548@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel > So, I do think it's a good idea to use that string as documentation but, > in this case, I think that using "qtbase" is inappropriate. What do you > think? So what would be a better string? "needs qtbase"?