From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Craven Subject: Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:46:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36129) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWpZq-0002vN-Oa for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 14:47:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWpZn-0001J0-44 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 14:47:06 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::243]:36545) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWpZl-0001Iq-Tp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 14:47:03 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-x243.google.com with SMTP id u134so25105222ywg.3 for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 11:47:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Vincent Legoll Cc: guix-devel > Do you prefer dynamically linked ? Usually we link stuff dynamically unless there is a reason to do otherwise. I guess in this case it's ok... Maybe someone else wants to answer this?