From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: xorg-server: Enable Xephyr.
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:50:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL1_imk4-=CiUDoSFheqD+WrTnFrvuXPtXs4Wovq9bX0AzUF0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160822202302.11716-1-david@craven.ch>
	<20160823014506.59f9f0e1@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47636)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bc9Hz-0001Hj-Eo
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:50:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bc9Hw-00064u-5G
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:50:39 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::243]:35229)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bc9Hu-00064E-Bh
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:50:35 -0400
Received: by mail-yw0-x243.google.com with SMTP id r9so4874267ywg.2
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 03:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160823014506.59f9f0e1@openmailbox.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

> `guix refresh -l xorg-server` says 369 dependent packages. Should this
> be put on core-updates?  What do others think?

I'll add it to core-updates.

Thanks!