From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Subject: Re: QtHaveModule
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:41:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL1_imk+VQwGBeSYANJ=wC7gi8_NJwpwtzrm++FOQxWk6puiPA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL1_immy+aVmU6Xos73N29jrXd+P-QLzbU56aWS+DDhrGiXNiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55889)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bYzPY-0005p4-Jd
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:41:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bYzPU-0000Ac-G7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:41:23 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::232]:35396)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bYzPT-0000AY-9C
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:41:20 -0400
Received: by mail-yw0-x232.google.com with SMTP id j12so16988818ywb.2
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 10:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_immy+aVmU6Xos73N29jrXd+P-QLzbU56aWS+DDhrGiXNiQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>

> Hi, I just sent a patch to add 'QMAKEPATH' as search-path, which should
> fix this issue.

Thank you! Yes this fixes the issue and is a lot cleaner than what I
came up with...