From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:20:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL1_im=zUwVSU6dQ7WkzYozoBEBbZLAp_njrP-gT1DQ6eACmqg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOFm3uHFc+EF=zJ1PS-oPjdZxsAA=4EUN_uvTPgYfG2CgcDTkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160805145804.26753-1-david@craven.ch> <87y44af52m.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87shuit01e.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_im=Dx++=-enXKKr8Y7PoiSk2OucpbhFav3-hKdn8FSj=TQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87eg60g79l.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_imnPANQfq2WCDDWCWtSEtEhWD2Ldt_Ziteq6cik5HuxPEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87a8gog154.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_imnYuTu7bT=yKyCfKP5ud2VF3m3HHuT3bTOzV4=8j3ehPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87vazcce0a.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42603)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bWibh-00079k-7H
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 07:20:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bWibc-000275-72
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 07:20:32 -0400
Received: from mail-yb0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22f]:35069)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bWibb-00025Z-0R
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 07:20:28 -0400
Received: by mail-yb0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id g133so36794780ybf.2
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 04:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87vazcce0a.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>

Quoting Ludo from the thread you mentioned:

> (Besides, our package meta-data would probably still refer to the =E2=80=
=9Creal=E2=80=9D
> home page of the package, from which it=E2=80=99s trivial to get the unmo=
dified
> tarball.)

The discussion only applies to 'guix build --source' and I can't see any
indication from reading the thread that displaying the original source url
would be in any way problematic. Can you quote something from that
thread that would indicate otherwise?