From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Craven Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: icecat: Enable gtk3 support. Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:27:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20161026184044.3351-1-david@craven.ch> <87d1imaivo.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzf6Q-0004KO-6n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:27:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzf6N-00011D-3w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:27:54 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]:36763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzf6M-00010B-Vi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:27:51 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id o68so33338052qkf.3 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:27:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87d1imaivo.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel > Is gtk+-2 still needed as an input? Do the two versions of gtk+ > conflict with each other at all? Yes, gtk+-2 is still needed. I'm not sure why exactly. They should not conflict, but some more testing might be nice. > So, my inclination would be to drop this last hunk of the patch. Yep, is probably a good idea.