From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Federico Beffa Subject: Re: forcing local build from a package definition Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:28:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ppdhxpl7.fsf@gmail.com> <87r3xvpz1v.fsf@gnu.org> <8761f7nd8v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40037) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xiqtu-00072m-8j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:28:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xiqtn-0005fp-SS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:28:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8761f7nd8v.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > In the not-too-distant future, we=E2=80=99ll be able to mark the package = as > non-substitutable, which will be best. There=E2=80=99s already a #:local= -build? > flag around, but its semantics are a bit fuzzy at the moment because it > determines both whether to offload and whether to substitute. I would > like that to be improved, by having two different options, before we > start relying on it in packages. That sounds great! Thanks, Fede