From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Federico Beffa Subject: Re: Broken URLs Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 14:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87si48zwlq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zxaah-0006di-0m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 08:10:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zxaag-0003PE-8B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 08:10:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87si48zwlq.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote= : > The URL probe is sensitive to latency and transient network issues, so > there can be false positives like this. Of course. The point is that if you are testing 1000s of URL at the same time, you may be overloading your own bit of network and you may need to increase the timeout. Regards, Fede