Thanks.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> wrote:
> Federico Beffa (2015-06-21 11:29 +0300) wrote:
>
> [...]
>> +(define* (emacs-byte-compile-directory dir #:optional (dependency-dirs '()))
>> +  "Byte compile all files in DIR and its sub-directories.  Before compiling
>> +the files, add DIR and all directories in DEPENDENCY-DIRS to 'load-path'."
>> +  (let ((expr `(progn
>> +                (add-to-list 'load-path ,dir)
>> +                (unless (null ,(if (null? dependency-dirs)
>> +                                   'nil
>> +                                   dependency-dirs))
>> +                  (setq load-path (append load-path ,dependency-dirs)))
>> +                (byte-recompile-directory (file-name-as-directory ,dir) 0))))
>> +    (emacs-batch-eval expr)))
>> +
>>  (define-syntax emacs-substitute-sexps
>>    (syntax-rules ()
>>      "Substitute the S-expression immediately following the first occurrence of
>
> Shouldn't there be problems with unquoted 'dependency-dirs' list?  IIUC
> the following:
>
>   (emacs-byte-compile-directory "/tmp/foo" '("one" "two"))
>
> will produce the following elisp expression:
>
> (progn
>   (add-to-list (quote load-path) "/tmp/foo")
>   (unless (null ("one" "two"))
>     (setq load-path (append load-path ("one" "two"))))
>   (byte-recompile-directory (file-name-as-directory "/tmp/foo") 0))
>
> but that will raise an error ‘(invalid-function "one")’.  Or did I miss
> anything?
>
> Also I believe dependency-dirs should have a preference over other
> 'load-path' directories.
>
> So what about the following variant:
>
>
>
> --
> Alex
>