From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: use of git-fetch
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:29:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKrPhPOqWddXZzFO9=5uvYKiu_2jCrAt5Jyo-qLjZD_4ZNoFbw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKrPhPMa1h48zwpa7XBJuve3ZHPeb+fjQRdXh=H97RadcDa5Aw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87h9ov6gqe.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48233)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1ZIA0j-0003DK-3M
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 02:29:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1ZIA0i-0003Pv-9s
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 02:29:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87h9ov6gqe.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote=
:
> Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> skribis:
>
>>               (sha256
>>                (base32
>>                 "06mc7kh3fzdh2mqkyynjnp0xpv30yfaiik8bqv8z5b6hldji3cky"))=
))
>
> [...]
>
>>               (sha256
>>                (base32
>>                 "06mc7kh3fzdh2mqkyynjnp0xpv30yfaiik8bqv8z5b6hldji3cky"))=
))
>
> Both recipes are telling that they use the same source.  So the daemon
> cleverly saves one download since it already has the thing with that
> hash on disk.  See?  :-)

Thanks for the reply!

I thought about this and, before posting, I also tried with an hash
where the first character was changed from '0' to '6'. It gave the
same result, even after deleting any existing 'emacs-dash' and
'emacs-s' derivation in the store. In my understanding that shouldn't
happen. Is that correct?

By changing the hash to a totally different one (a string of '6's) it
downloads the right repo. As expected, it complains about the hash and
gives me the right one which I can copy into the package recipe.
(That's The Lazy work-flow :-).)

Regards,
Fede

>
> HTH,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.