From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Federico Beffa Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] build: Add 'emacs-build-system' Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:51:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87twu06bhk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6xSM-0004fX-F4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:51:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6xSL-0001Dw-KP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:51:54 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]:35311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6xSL-0001Dq-F7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:51:53 -0400 Received: by iefd2 with SMTP id d2so53981635ief.2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 01:51:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87twu06bhk.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: Guix-devel On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Alex Kost wrote: >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..da2b594 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/guix/build-system/emacs.scm > [...] >> + #:tests? ,tests? >> + #:phases ,phases >> + #:outputs %outputs >> + #:search-paths ',(map search-path-specification->sexp >> + search-paths) >> + #:inputs %build-inputs))) >> + > spaces on this line ^ Hi, thanks for the review! This and other spaces that you indicate as "extra", are included by Emacs by pressing TAB. This is because, as an example, the above snippet finishes an internal define form and not a top-level form. I'm following the Emacs behavior. Is there a convention to suppress all spaces (in spite of what Emacs does)? Regards, Fede