On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> wrote:
> FYI, this pattern of using 'fold' with 'and' and a boolean seed would be
> more transparent if handled by 'every' from (srfi srfi-1):
>
>   (every (lambda (f)
>            (zero? (system* emacs "--batch" "-Q" "-L" el-dir
>                            "-f" "batch-byte-compile" f)))
>          (find-files "." "\\.el$"))

Thanks for the comment. I saw the form 'every' in the past, but 'fold'
always come first to my mind.  Probably because it took me more
neurons to understand how to use it :-)

> However, this won't be needed here if you use 'emacs-batch-eval' or add
> 'emacs-byte-compile' as suggested by Ludovic, which I agree is the right
> approach.

What do you think about the attached implementation?

Thanks,
Fede