From: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
To: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] build: Add 'emacs-build-system'
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:43:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKrPhPNDq6vNb_ruztHKj-L9Dr-RTMgWHhiqZvqyc_XRtSu7tQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pp401pb5.fsf@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> wrote:
> Federico Beffa (2015-07-09 23:41 +0300) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Federico Beffa (2015-07-08 23:22 +0300) wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> A side note: I think generally it would be preferable to use an upstream
>>>>> release in the package recipe rather than to use a melpa(-stable) URL,
>>>>> i.e.:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://foo-upstream.org/foo-0.1.tar.gz instead of
>>>>> http://stable.melpa.org/packages/foo-0.1.tar
>>>>
>>>> I believe that such information is not available from ELPA archives.
>>>> Therefore the ELPA importer has no way to do this. But, obviously,
>>>> manual modification is possible. (By the way, the tar files are
>>>> similar but not identical.)
>>>
>>> Surely, I didn't mean that it's a task for the elpa importer. I'm
>>> totally for the manual modification to use an upstream release, not the
>>> melpa(-stable) one.
>>>
>>> By "the tar files are similar" do you mean that MELPA usually leaves
>>> only elisp files in the tarballs? I think since it's a common practice
>>> to put elisp files in the root directory of the repo, we should add a
>>> phase to the emacs build system to remove non-elisp files (like
>>> .gitignore or README) from the final
>>> /gnu/store/…-foo-0.1/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/foo-0.1/ directory.
>>
>> One difference that I noticed in the tar files is that tar coming from
>> elpa archives always include the .info file, while the upstream ones
>> do not always do so. I've not investigated further differences.
>
> I think that the upstream never include (at least they shouldn't)
> ".info" files. So perhaps it would be good to add a phase for building
> info manual if there are ".texi" files and no ".info".
>
>> While often the READMEs are not very usefull, sometimes they are.
>
> But do people look at ~/.guix-profile/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/foo
> directory to find README and other useful non-elisp files?
My guess is that people using the Emacs packaging system (and by
extension Emacs users) do, because that's very similar to the Emacs'
native packaging strategy.
>
>> Therefore I do not like the idea of removing them, nor anything else
>> provided by the package. It's upstream who should decide what's
>> relevant. With the use of 'guix.d' there will be no name clashes. Did
>> you happen to see the following thread?
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00392.html
>
> Yes, I read it, but when you say «provided by the package» and «It's
> upstream who should decide», you are talking about the packages imported
> from (m)elpa, not the upstream itself. Since melpa is unusable (due to
> a hash problem), we'll have to use the direct upstream releases, which
> are not stripped from ".gitignore" and other unrelated files. So all
> these files will move into "…/.guix.d/package" dir.
>
> As an example, try the following variant of "emacs-mmm-mode" package:
>
>
>
> As you can see, there are many odd files in the
> "…/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/mmm-mode-0.5.4" directory.
>
> So I suggest to add a phase for deleting non-".el[c]" files from the
> ".guix.d/package" directory.
>
> And just in case: I have nothing against GNU ELPA repository (especially
> taking into account that it is the only "home" for some packages). I'm
> against melpa and melpa-stable, because:
>
> - Why should we rely on a third-party server that do something with the
> upstream files to produce a final tarball?
Well, that's just a necessary step to make Emacs 'package.el' work properly.
>
> - MELPA(-stable) is not usable anyway, because the tarballs of the same
> version are updated all the time, so the hash is being permanently
> changed.
>
> However, if a package from ELPA has a real upstream release that can be
> used with "gnu-build-system" (e.g., emms, auctex, mmm-mode), I think we
> should prefer it instead of importing it from ELPA.
Nowadays many Emacs packages recommend to use Emacs' packaging system
as the preferred method of installation. See e.g.
https://github.com/purcell/mmm-mode
However, the hash problem with packages from melpa appears to be a show stopper.
Fede
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 7:21 [PATCH 3/5] build: Add 'emacs-build-system' Federico Beffa
2015-07-07 16:58 ` Alex Kost
2015-07-08 20:22 ` Federico Beffa
2015-07-09 8:51 ` Alex Kost
2015-07-09 20:41 ` Federico Beffa
2015-07-10 6:47 ` Alex Kost
2015-07-10 7:43 ` Federico Beffa [this message]
2015-07-15 21:52 ` Ludovic Courtès
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-21 8:31 Federico Beffa
2015-06-21 20:40 ` Alex Kost
2015-06-22 8:51 ` Federico Beffa
2015-06-22 11:49 ` Mathieu Lirzin
2015-06-22 17:59 ` Alex Kost
2015-06-22 19:33 ` Federico Beffa
2015-06-22 19:40 ` Thompson, David
2015-06-23 6:51 ` Federico Beffa
2015-06-25 11:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-06-25 18:39 ` Federico Beffa
2015-06-23 11:57 ` Alex Kost
2015-06-24 16:12 ` Federico Beffa
2015-06-25 12:33 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-06-25 18:36 ` Federico Beffa
2015-06-27 9:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-07-06 17:47 ` Alex Kost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKrPhPNDq6vNb_ruztHKj-L9Dr-RTMgWHhiqZvqyc_XRtSu7tQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=beffa@ieee.org \
--cc=alezost@gmail.com \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.