From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: btrfs-progs: Update to 4.4.1. Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 04:08:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1456532224-4661-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> <20160227224142.5941a0ef@debian-netbook> <20160227232746.GA6690@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abg5z-0006AH-Vz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:08:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abg5y-0000EE-Nd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:08:03 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]:32856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abg5y-0000EA-IP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:08:02 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-x235.google.com with SMTP id fz5so39390122obc.0 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:08:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160227232746.GA6690@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On 28/02/2016, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:17:04 +0100 >> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >> >> > * gnu/packages/linux.scm (btrfs-progs): Update to 4.4.1. > >> looks good to me! >> >> applied in 9c7f7e2d. > > Thanks for keeping up with this pcakage, Tobias! > > Have you had a chance to investigate how to include it in the initrd? > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-02/msg00489.html [Lynx won't let me remove lines. Nice. At least I'm on GuixSD] Hullo Leo, Sorry, not yet. I've had no free time lately. I hope the coming week will bring some. Either way, 0.9.1 won't yet have much butter in it. I'll try writing a static package expression before diving into the initrd, which I'm guessing is quite different from that of your average Linux distribution... Kind regards, T G-R