From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thompson, David" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Add arc-icon-theme. Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:50:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20160607123555.14504-1-dthompson2@worcester.edu> <20160607123555.14504-3-dthompson2@worcester.edu> <87inxh2pnh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47029) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBLtj-0008PV-Jq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:50:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBLth-00060D-IX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:50:50 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::236]:36586) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBLth-000604-Df for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:50:49 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id g67so95803347vkb.3 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:50:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87inxh2pnh.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > David Thompson skribis: > >> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (arc-icon-theme): New variable. > > [...] > >> + (home-page "https://github.com/horst3180/arc-icon-theme") >> + ;; No "or later" language found. >> + (license license:gpl3))) > > Looking more closely (the same goes for the two other themes), it seems > there are no source file headers, because source files are SVGs, so in > effect, there=E2=80=99s no place where they could write =E2=80=9Cv3 only= =E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9Cv3 or any > later version=E2=80=9D. > > In that case, the license text prevails, and thus, we write it as > =E2=80=98gpl3+=E2=80=99. > > Does it make sense? > > Otherwise LGTM, thanks! Makes sense! Fixed and pushed. - Dave