From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Subject: Re: Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt?
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:25:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJ=RwfZ=Li+J22LAtYyuSbFvTJKJSQ5nBhTZsbykqo2g0gwqgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87ziv9z55p.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87vb5xz28g.fsf@dustycloud.org>
	<87oabolkf3.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37906)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dthompson2@worcester.edu>) id 1aTVhc-00071z-9A
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:25:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dthompson2@worcester.edu>) id 1aTVhb-0007CP-FD
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:25:08 -0500
Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]:35410)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dthompson2@worcester.edu>) id 1aTVhb-0007Bv-8h
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:25:07 -0500
Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id d63so22436804ioj.2
	for <help-guix@gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 06:25:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87oabolkf3.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: help-guix <help-guix@gnu.org>

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> skribis:
>
>> Just for posterity, Dave helped me figure out what was wrong.  I missed
>> putting guile-2.0 in my inputs.  Critical!  Well, once I did that,
>> things were fine!
>
> Indeed.  However, since Haunt ships a command-line tool, we should fix
> the Haunt package in Guix to wrap =E2=80=98bin/haunt=E2=80=99 such that t=
he tool has
> GUILE_LOAD_PATH and GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH properly set.
>
> Done in 4ecbf6d.  I think it should be fixed upstream though.  :-)

I don't understand why this would require an upstream fix for what
seems to be a Guix-specific quirk.  Could you elaborate?

> BTW, =E2=80=98guix build haunt --with-input=3Dguile=3Dguile-next=E2=80=99=
 fails at configure
> time (it insists on 2.0.)

Thanks, Ludo.  I noticed that in another project of mine.  I guess I'm
using the wrong autoconf macro to check for the version being greater
than 2.0.x.  I'll have to figure out what the correct thing is.

- Dave