From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id YNLyAj0TDmOiOQEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:13 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2LL0Aj0TDmOgfAEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:13 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8356A3CC71 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34076 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oT1TP-0002sQ-Kt for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:40:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oT1TG-0002sG-HQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:40:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oT1TG-0006FF-3i for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:40:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oT1TF-0004YU-UK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:40:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57467: [EXT] Re: [EXT] Re: bug#57467: 'guix shell' does not honor default behavior when given a specific command to run Resent-From: "Thompson, David" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57467 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxime Devos Cc: 57467@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 57467-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57467.166186679117489 (code B ref 57467); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:40:01 +0000 Received: (at 57467) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2022 13:39:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oT1T4-0004Y1-P6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:39:51 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com ([209.85.167.42]:45920) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oT1T0-0004Xk-OX for 57467@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:39:49 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id w8so6529061lft.12 for <57467@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 06:39:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=worcester-edu.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=rM58lyyHEWynSxuuSs/SumTpXbpWAX4y21nQnZewmx8=; b=srQJIOpS1kLA1zEWnMRtX9/B/bxJZEABCD/jSJTHPzFq12rh9GgnEmC08JVF/gt0A9 +Cp+ea4SCMhOPXknMTrlJUWgb4ZQ36g2u7XlQ0Dg/aW+Erd1SipqVfPbITBm64o10I7V TF2fpSgU/kV5/jQE3cAbVY/ke5guoTgFGo5sXCEWM+WC0jUCIdYXcFhnOPHw+qq4PuH7 y5Vsrx9XOx9C4R9MfJ2v1rxFLC+7o5xFnEyL65TTXbFsqFYcZKpUTWJHGD8UasoIpty4 N5GnxQ1e5CsL6YDbsEdQz6/hsgDeKPAfoLSu5bHF4JcqvG2p38hE/4hhYa8Gf+10i97g bKrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=rM58lyyHEWynSxuuSs/SumTpXbpWAX4y21nQnZewmx8=; b=4unPuRTPslOVn3hQX96nqe+XVKJYv15IVWyKuEex54EMbrBxTaf+ZCDun8d1zousP7 /vTyH035jrUmm1/QqXdtgMZz5ydTuqH0j5cgXMDGpiFuZmRvj0fVyw+k14YbXBQpdMhl CODGFOPTEjIuL2z0c34DzIof1tdB5Ic/jZK8A0uFQDEw1bb44c/iWw4liweWtDegyDwH H8Tt7bl2DpjUikn6LgGRxCLAnpePK6JApNEM/Xrjr8gLx2PkhKcDDD0CqN6bXc2yQKic iCGbJ2A7nj7970fIuUosGOS7fI2ZpG7fLxbpWWUtvpxNJ8kebSdHbQCqAMne0Je5boPg rYtg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2tmAj8Xsl5UZ3chOtGDOqD3uIlettKwjEGYNbkQXcd2SHpvPAP QcVaBkRY1nCgZ+VOwUtoIMKvTBRIuoCjHTKV9tb82w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR62N93CJTe6Godlnvc+3sfdYYqrea+JF/6i1G7Jfd9iLYpltHBPo6WZzikvLtqKrZmNzca1UVpB8SjKWyChP+o= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:10d4:b0:492:ede1:ec75 with SMTP id k20-20020a05651210d400b00492ede1ec75mr7304131lfg.146.1661866780435; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 06:39:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200fa302-b6bf-fc76-d88b-92b661f53c2c@telenet.be> In-Reply-To: <200fa302-b6bf-fc76-d88b-92b661f53c2c@telenet.be> From: "Thompson, David" Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:39:29 -0400 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001cbf9505e7758370" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1661866812; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=rM58lyyHEWynSxuuSs/SumTpXbpWAX4y21nQnZewmx8=; b=OguToUBYSV80LkjaUcEod8IIsTj8LMs5KpZCFbBgiA7MQ9Dt8WsiObRYPdQx/ZimISZmsJ HzWBsXyWD0HMUkj5j3syrceJlnn4pmrJQDyXB8wHgWSpQHB9BGpu0ztnAv/pEEBO0gFHUs GLnMLq5yPUwpbhUaRIBB7bTHoSvOrFEz0aFe8y5wxXEt5fn+cYDFkL2emybR0AcQM9fBkt aa4ViYRUpFsGILO+c9y0LWbrD4Af+C++FOGsnircrmHZ9jwolmDW0P19OUcAYFYC/Wksji JT8JzPPszZyics5bsbwChe4v9Zl3nmj74RfIoWnYdX7kIfybDMGzFGfPlGsdMg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1661866812; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KbIdnW4j50LEAP4wktW/NcWWuMdN9kODlKFZ3ZhpXzq59sf5fQ2oNWEIRvf7pvTpefddSe Qvr9/QqtWIQAXjgcNuZgS4hfEkut7USvOf0U6XdlfFqLw6ool9/9HURSy4VNE2AX63+MmQ dVM7nz+6S2wFYlRhEuOjC3yaRrOIzRJoK/3KwX6teLxDZc/gvipvxorysS/V++Twry12QA Biog9NR7E6r57VmLtf71NqHelm6+IhaVW+28GrJBb01rsqvCadbnNFB8xm+nGUPvCspp5m xBb9pLz10jMbNfkksvQPwixJKPGR50/7npFAN92fMIaU6yalYHVypL7z6j6izw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=worcester-edu.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=srQJIOpS; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 1.21 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=worcester-edu.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=srQJIOpS; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8356A3CC71 X-Spam-Score: 1.21 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: NmJPwKCW0Rrv --0000000000001cbf9505e7758370 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 9:24 AM Maxime Devos wrote= : > On 29-08-2022 14:48, Thompson, David wrote: > > Hi Maxime, > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 6:29 AM Maxime Devos > wrote: > >> On 29-08-2022 03:28, Thompson, David wrote: >> >> Hi again, >> >> I decided to just implement the fix and see what people think of it. >> Simply removing a check for non-interactive invocation solves the issue = and >> now 'guix shell' and 'guix shell -- make' act exactly the same except fo= r >> which command they run. Patch attached. >> >> The interactive check is a feature, not a bug: >> > Could you please explain why it's a feature? > > The quoted text was my explanation. Maybe that thread has more > information, or failing that, maybe the person I quoted knows why. > Oops, I missed this. It looked like a quoted section of my original email so I totally missed it and was confused. My bad. > I've provided an example that shows how it is confusing and unexpected. > > Your example was "guix shell -- ...", not interactive checks in general. > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50960#69: >> [...] >> Agreed. The automatic reading of guix.scm/manifest.scm, if we keep it, >> should only happen in interactive use; I=E2=80=99ll double-check and mak= e sure >> this is the case. >> >> It might still be possible to solve 57467, but I don't think this patch >> is the solution. >> > > Could you propose an alternate solution? What are the next steps here? > Right now all I know is that you don't like my patch. > > Possibly, but try proposing an alternate solution yourself first. And you > know more than that, you know that the interactive check shouldn't be > simply removed and have a link to a discussion that may have more > information. > The hostility here and in the other issue where you are applying stop energy to my work is less than appreciated. Please stop it. - Dave --0000000000001cbf9505e7758370 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 9:24 AM Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
=20
On 29-08-2022 14:48, Thompson, David wrote:
=20
Hi Maxime,

On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 6:29 AM Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
On 29-08-2022 03:28, Thompson, David wrote:
Hi again,

I decided to just implement the fix and see what people think of it.=C2=A0 Simply removing a check for non-interactive invocation solves the issue and now 'guix shell' and 'guix shell -- make' a= ct exactly the same except for which command they run.=C2=A0 Patch attached.

The interactive check is a feature, not a bug:

Could you please explain why it's a feature?
The quoted text was my explanation. Maybe that thread has more information, or failing that, maybe the person I quoted knows why.
<= /div>

Oops, I missed this. It looked like a= quoted section of my original email so I totally missed it and was confuse= d.=C2=A0 My bad.
I've provided an example that shows how it is confusing and unexpected.
Your example was "guix shell -- ...", not interactive checks = in general.

https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50960#69:=
[...]
Agreed. The automatic reading of guix.scm/manifest.scm, if we keep it,
should only happen in interactive use; I=E2=80=99ll double-check and make sure
this is the case.
It might still be possible to solve 57467, but I don't think this patch is the solution.

Could you propose an alternate solution?=C2=A0 What are th= e next steps here?=C2=A0 Right now all I know is that you don&#= 39;t like my patch.

Possibly, but try proposing an alternate solution yourself first. And you know more than that, you know that the interactive check shouldn't be simply removed and have a link to a discussion that may have more information.

=C2=A0The hostility here and in the other issue= where you are applying stop energy to my work is less than appreciated.=C2= =A0 Please stop it.

- Dave
--0000000000001cbf9505e7758370--