From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thompson, David" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add manaplus. Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:56:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wpv2jvgr.fsf@gmail.com> <87oag8qkp8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkayB-0002zZ-Hc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:56:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zkay8-0007Hy-25 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:56:35 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:34371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zkay5-00079p-Ad for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:56:29 -0400 Received: by ykdg206 with SMTP id g206so83826983ykd.1 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:56:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87oag8qkp8.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel , Alex Kost On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> I don't know if there is a better workaround for the SDL headers, but >> this problem is rather common: there is a workaround in 'abbaye' and a >> special patch for 'pingus'. >> >> The problem is: the source code has lines like this: >> >> #include >> >> but the headers of all SDL packages are placed in =E2=80=9Cinclude/SDL/= =E2=80=9D >> subdirectories. And an upstream often doesn't use "pkg-config" for >> every SDL package to define CFLAGS and assumes that all SDL headers are >> placed in one directory. So we have to invent workarounds for such >> packages. >> >> I just mention this problem here, perhaps someone will come up with a >> general solution. > > Can=E2=80=99t =E2=80=98sdl-union=E2=80=99 be used here? I think it was c= reated specifically to > solve this problem. (Currently it=E2=80=99s private to (gnu packages sdl= ) but > you can export it.) Do you have any concerns about this package being picked up by UIs now that it will be public? Might confuse a user or two, dunno. - Dave