From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catonano Subject: Re: Guix infrastructure Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:44:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170701173604.vjzta4fccjfuqxoy@abyayala> <20170701180111.GA29205@jasmine.lan> <86d19dxg42.fsf@gmail.com> <20170707030042.GD1280@jasmine.lan> <87tw2o8mno.fsf@gnu.org> <86r2xql9s1.fsf@gmail.com> <87zicej8qr.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c193dbe755f6705540f16b4" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43397) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dV0AP-0000hf-Cq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:45:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dV0AL-000557-Gu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:45:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com ([209.85.128.174]:35210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dV0AL-0004rA-9X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:45:45 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k67so1054708wrc.2 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:45:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zicej8qr.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel , myglc2 --94eb2c193dbe755f6705540f16b4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wow, I had totally missed this thread ! 2017-07-09 10:49 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Wurmus : > > myglc2 writes: > > > As you have experienced here, the learning/deployment costs and hassle > > associated with each new type of server often dwarfs other costs. The > > best way to minimize this is to minimize the number of types of servers > > you own. > > The servers I=E2=80=99m preparing to add to the build farm once I=E2=80= =99m back to the > office are all of the same type. There are dozens of them. > Ah, this is good news ! I can't wait :-) --94eb2c193dbe755f6705540f16b4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Wow, I had totally missed this thread !

2017-0= 7-09 10:49 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>:

myglc2 <myglc2@gmail.com> wri= tes:

> As you have experienced here, the learning/deployment costs and hassle=
> associated with each new type of server often dwarfs other costs. The<= br> > best way to minimize this is to minimize the number of types of server= s
> you own.

The servers I=E2=80=99m preparing to add to the build farm once I=E2= =80=99m back to the
office are all of the same type.=C2=A0 There are dozens of them.

Ah, this is good news !

I can&= #39;t wait :-)
--94eb2c193dbe755f6705540f16b4--