From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catonano Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option. Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:17:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170307214959.16038114@scratchpost.org> <87r3284x8s.fsf@lassieur.org> <87h92t1qts.fsf@gnu.org> <20170316204527.lnkgc2vot4uqk633@abyayala> <20170317053620.GA16076@jocasta.intra> <20170317162131.GA4354@jasmine> <20170317175802.GB30584@jocasta.intra> <20170318110952.xhhobwl5ep4mlbpj@abyayala> <87k27mn6zl.fsf@gnu.org> <20170318115216.pjhmdbdcvttzaw3u@abyayala> <20170318121012.GA15086@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1b45dcdb8781054b0048df Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpDJ2-0006Mr-Pr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 08:18:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpDJ1-00010U-CB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 08:18:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]:35182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpDJ1-00010G-1L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 08:17:59 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id g10so66474729wrg.2 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 05:17:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170318121012.GA15086@jocasta.intra> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel --94eb2c1b45dcdb8781054b0048df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2017-03-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 John Darrington : > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:52:16AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > May I remind you that the first reaction of John is being rude to > anyone > who isn't a native speaker? > > That is absolutely not true. I have reviewed this current thread and I do > not > see any instance of rudeness on my part. > > As I have explained *most* people appreciate it when offerred corrections > - be > it code, language or whatever. I certainly appreciate corrections of my > mistakes, Do you ? You are fiercely fighting a correction that has been offered to you by ng0 and by mantainers too. Corrections are not about linguistics or programming langages only. There are community (people) issues too. and on occassion people have taken the time to thank me for the time > I take to correct theirs. Well, this is not the case, is it ? > That is what collaboration is about. You have > explicitly asked me not to correct you - and I respect that request - I > will not > do so in future. However, if I see you giving erroneous advice to a third > party > I may interject with my own opinion. > In so doing, you would be actively assaulting a member of this community. > > I'm sorry that you feel this way. No, you're not > I would still like to work with you - and > that means I appreciate constructive criticism from anyone, about anything. > Plenty of constructive critism iis being offered, here, and you seem to be belligerent against it On the only basis that the criticism is not about language. > > For example, we don't often speak German in Guix, but if we were to do so, > I would be very grateful to you, as a native German speaker, if you would > correct > me when I make a grammatical mistake. > Well, other people is not being grateful, here --94eb2c1b45dcdb8781054b0048df Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2017-03-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 John Darrington <jo= hn@darrington.wattle.id.au>:
On= Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:52:16AM +0000, ng0 wrote:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0May I remind you that the first reaction of John is bei= ng rude to anyone
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0who isn't a native speaker?

That is absolutely not true.=C2=A0 I have reviewed this current thre= ad and I do not
see any instance of rudeness on my part.

As I have explained *most* people appreciate it when offerred corrections -= be
it code, language or whatever.=C2=A0 I certainly appreciate corrections of = my
mistakes,

Do you ? You are fiercely fighti= ng a correction that has been offered to you by ng0 and by mantainers too.<= br>
Corrections are not about linguistics or programming lang= ages only. There are community (people) issues too.


and on occassion people have taken the time to th= ank me for the time
I take to correct theirs.=C2=A0

Well, this= is not the case, is it ?
=C2=A0
That is what collaboration is about.=C2=A0 You have
explicitly asked me not to correct you - and I respect that request - I wil= l not
do so in future.=C2=A0 However, if I see you giving erroneous advice to a t= hird party
I may interject with my own opinion.

In= so doing, you would be actively assaulting a member of this community.
= =C2=A0

I'm sorry that you feel this way.=C2=A0

No, you're not
=C2=A0
I wo= uld still like to work with you - and
that means I appreciate constructive criticism from anyone, about anything.=

Plenty of constructive critism iis bei= ng offered, here, and you seem to be belligerent against it

On the only basis that the criticism is not about language.
=C2=A0

For example, we don't often speak German in Guix, but if we were to do = so,
I would be very grateful to you, as a native German speaker, if you would c= orrect
me when I make a grammatical mistake.

W= ell, other people is not being grateful, here
--94eb2c1b45dcdb8781054b0048df--