bug#25836: [PATCH] gnu: Add gspell

[Catonano <catonano@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1560 bytes --]

2017-05-17 19:22 GMT+02:00 Catonano <catonano@gmail.com>:

>
>
> 2017-05-17 16:24 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just pushed gspell as 411ba511893feca223656122059cb12378b95c91,
>> finally!  \o/
>>
>> Thomas Danckaert <post@thomasdanckaert.be> skribis:
>>
>> > Just for reference, for when we solve the dictionary issue:
>> >
>> > While experimenting with this package and (unsuccessfully) trying to get
>> > it to find aspell dictionaries, I also noticed we could add the
>> > following native inputs:
>> >
>> > +       ("docbook-xsl" ,docbook-xsl)
>> > +       ("gobject-introspection" ,gobject-introspection)
>> > +       ("gtk-doc" ,gtk-doc)
>> > +       ("vala" ,vala)
>> >         ("glib" ,glib "bin")
>> >         ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
>> >         ("xmllint" ,libxml2)
>> >         ("xorg-server" ,xorg-server)))
>> >
>> > and the following configure flag to build docs:
>> >
>> > +       #:configure-flags '("--enable-gtk-doc")
>> >
>> > I'm not really familiar with the gobject system, but I suppose
>> > generating the bindings is useful? :)
>>
>> For now we don’t have any users of gspell at all, let alone users of its
>> Vala bindings, so perhaps we can leave it as is?
>>
>
> Originally, I wanted gspell because I understood that it's a dependency of
> Polari, the Gnome chat client.
>
> Once this aspell path thing is solved, should any bindings be necessary
> for Polari, they could be added later, couldn't they ?
>
>
>
Thank you so much or this, Ludo ! 🤗

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2556 bytes --]