From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catonano Subject: Re: project hosting Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 16:50:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170911134718.zlx4rhvwarbqkokr@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0c3d5e7817180558eb0bd2" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drQ2V-0006rE-6O for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:50:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drQ2U-0006MX-3E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:50:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]:45251) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drQ2T-0006Lt-T0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:50:18 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id f199so41749601wme.0 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:50:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170911134718.zlx4rhvwarbqkokr@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Catonano , guix-devel --94eb2c0c3d5e7817180558eb0bd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" 2017-09-11 15:47 GMT+02:00 ng0 : > Catonano transcribed 1.3K bytes: > > At the GHM I showed Rekado this > > > > https://git.fsfe.org/ > > > > and he didn't know, although he does know the fsfe people, as they are > > German and based in Berlin > > As far as I took from the fsfe public discussion when it was released, > it is for FSFE internal projects (supporting activities of the org, > and only for sustaining members). The important piece is "only for > sustaining members". You can try to question it again, but as far as > I remember the voted presentatives were clear on this, as opening it > up for the public would mean increased costs (cpu time, bandwidth) > and increased time spent with tech support. > This is just from my memory, I did not participate in the discussion > in fsfe. > > Ah it seems you're right The service is offered to supporters only Oh well --94eb2c0c3d5e7817180558eb0bd2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2017-09-11 15:47 GMT+02:00 ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org>:
Catonano transcribed 1.3K bytes:
> At the GHM I showed Rekado this
>
> https://git.fsfe.org/
>
> and he didn't know, although he does know the fsfe people, as they= are
> German and based in Berlin

As far as I took from the fsfe public discussion when it was release= d,
it is for FSFE internal projects (supporting activities of the org,
and only for sustaining members). The important piece is "only for
sustaining members". You can try to question it again, but as far as I remember the voted presentatives were clear on this, as opening it
up for the public would mean increased costs (cpu time, bandwidth)
and increased time spent with tech support.
This is just from my memory, I did not participate in the discussion
in fsfe.


Ah it seems you're right
The service is offered to supporters only
Oh well

=C2=A0

--94eb2c0c3d5e7817180558eb0bd2--