all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Improving ‘guix search’ scoring
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:11:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ3rdcbHhZAZu9r2FkW_g-S=suoj5k20mHKnpexksokwKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878ssw8i7g.fsf_-_@gnu.org>

Hi,

On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 23:27, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> I guess computing the TF-IDF could perhaps improve the results compared
> to the current scoring mechanism.  It would be worth trying to implement
> it.
>
> The bottom line though, as you wrote, is that this all depends on the
> quality of synopses and descriptions, and there’s only so much we can
> draw from 5-line descriptions.

From my opinion, because the description is say 5 lines plus the
synopsis, before implementing something, one needs to first analyse
the "quality" of the available information (words + dependencies). I
mean doing some "data science" (buzz buzz! :-)) with R or Python.
And I do not know the state-of-art of recommender systems. Neither
applied to packages retrieval. I have never read something about that
in other distributions (Debian, Gentoo, etc.). Someone does? Any
pointer?

For example, the current scoring looks like a poor man version of the
Boolean model of Information Retrieval [1]. What about the Okapi model
[2]? etc.

Well, if a student is reading this thread and is looking for a project. ;-)

And I will try to give a look after my summer holidays.
Please share your opinion or experience.


All the best,
simon


[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_model_of_information_retrieval
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okapi_BM25

      reply	other threads:[~2019-07-18 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-09 16:07 Organizing packages Jesse Gibbons
2019-07-14 13:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-07-15 17:21   ` Jesse Gibbons
2019-07-15 17:38     ` Robert Vollmert
2019-07-15 20:15       ` Jesse Gibbons
2019-07-15 21:37     ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-07-16 17:04   ` zimoun
2019-07-17 21:27     ` Improving ‘guix search’ scoring Ludovic Courtès
2019-07-18 11:11       ` zimoun [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJ3okZ3rdcbHhZAZu9r2FkW_g-S=suoj5k20mHKnpexksokwKQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=jgibbons2357@gmail.com \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.