From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j02PY-00020Q-I9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:07:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j02PX-0005OJ-Cp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:07:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j02PX-0005Nb-9I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:07:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j02PW-00070h-4j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:07:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38546] [00/11] Update Julia, Fix precompilation, add HTTP.jl Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87v9qpvbyr.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87wo9ouaq5.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87d0bcly8f.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <877e1jdd62.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> In-Reply-To: From: zimoun Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 13:06:01 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2?= Balzarotti Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 38546@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Nicol=C3=B3, On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 19:03, zimoun wrote: > I have tried them. Ouch! The tests eat so much... The tests fail on my desktop machine with 8GB of RAM. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- running testset Distributed... ERROR: LoadError: TaskFailedException: Timed out waiting to read host:port string from worker. Stacktrace: [1] worker_from_id(::Distributed.ProcessGroup, ::Int64) at /tmp/guix-build-julia-1.3.1.drv-0/julia-1.3.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.3/D= istributed/src/cluster.jl:1059 [2] worker_from_id at /tmp/guix-build-julia-1.3.1.drv-0/julia-1.3.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.3/D= istributed/src/cluster.jl:1056 [inlined] [3] #remote_do#156 at /tmp/guix-build-julia-1.3.1.drv-0/julia-1.3.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.3/D= istributed/src/remotecall.jl:482 [inlined] [4] remote_do at /tmp/guix-build-julia-1.3.1.drv-0/julia-1.3.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.3/D= istributed/src/remotecall.jl:482 [inlined] [5] kill at /tmp/guix-build-julia-1.3.1.drv-0/julia-1.3.1/usr/share/julia/= stdlib/v1.3/Distributed/src/managers.jl:534 [inlined] [6] create_worker(::Distributed.LocalManager, ::WorkerConfig) at /tmp/guix-build-julia-1.3.1.drv-0/julia-1.3.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.3/D= istributed/src/cluster.jl:581 [7] setup_launched_worker(::Distributed.LocalManager, ::WorkerConfig, ::Array{Int64,1}) at /tmp/guix-build-julia-1.3.1.drv-0/julia-1.3.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.3/D= istributed/src/cluster.jl:523 [8] (::Distributed.var"#43#46"{Distributed.LocalManager,Array{Int64,1},Wor= kerConfig})() at ./task.jl:333 [...more failed...] --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Do they pass on your machine? > And I have not tried yet to build with '--check'. Still not reproducible as expected [1]. :-) [1] http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/22304 Cheers, simon ps: I think you are busy by your thesis. Cross the fingers. ;-)