From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: Re: Re-approaching package tagging Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:36:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <875zvsq8ov.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87imzrgjit.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8fa7ums.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54161) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZHyu-0005mP-Nc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:12:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZHyp-0002Mc-4w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:12:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h8fa7ums.fsf@dustycloud.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Christopher Lemmer Webber Cc: Guix Devel Dear, How the relevance is evaluated ? And how the regexp works ? Maybe, I miss the documentation in the manual. I share the same feeling as Ludo about debtags. What do you think about `aptitude search` User Interface? https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s04s05.en.html Thank you in advance for any pointer. All the best, simon