From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: Re: guix build --repair might not always work Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 17:39:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k15ib5d4.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <878slv8l7y.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j8o6H-000634-FO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:39:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j8o6G-0003y7-J7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:39:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878slv8l7y.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel , =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2_Balzarotti?= Hi, On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 19:06, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > And nothing else. So, let's check the hash > > In particular, you should compare the actual hash returned by =E2=80=9Cgu= ix hash > -r=E2=80=9D with that stored in the local database. If they match, then = the > store item is not considered corrupt. It is not possible to do that at the CLI level, right? And how do you do that at the Scheme level? All the best, simon