From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: Re: guix package: Rename "generation" options Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 14:58:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <80a7f0b8-9fb0-239d-bc61-d99209e95cb3@crazy-compilers.com> <20191112085843.h5gzy34ompkf7mto@rafflesia> <87tv72ojjo.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50349) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWhY9-0006zh-Cm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:58:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWhY8-0001QL-De for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:58:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tv72ojjo.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel Hi, On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 at 11:59, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > That said, I agree that the inconsistency is troubling. Would it be > better to have =E2=80=98guix list-generations=E2=80=99, etc.? Or maybe t= hat =E2=80=98guix > profile=E2=80=99 command that has been proposed before? Let add this to the current big discussion on the very topic of UI proposed by Konrad. :-) Personally, I am not fan with the multiplication of commands. And a better direction seems to have a generic alias system "=C3=A0 la" Git or an UI modifier via channel. All the best, simon