From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id iFTHH6nUAWQ6SgEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 12:06:17 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id AH29H6nUAWR+PQAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 12:06:17 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F23137FF for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 12:06:17 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=UYfPlWoz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1677841577; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=jKPP+kdhi+ivfHl2XfnnQnFuLlY2k4F264uod80Ark4=; b=BKz3wGgNnw6Gi8U+ruHA3woYPfhxMJ9jpJP4rpeor8vvC0qJEAK+pXzhqMUk3Vi4YLJVER rD5/1+Y9sEcb3NaMJ8CRthEA/nff24MfNm46ro548/C1wiDYAbJgFuQibIVVvfZad1ACJt cgWr3wBO8WHpOX9+5RswYPvg9qL7CTdNEd/nBHB6hLdhiPqBRsfiDSl1zZBNX5Y0R8nHON OhkhIK/msO07n+4ixe2ikvKR3HfrW+IAOaajTanEr35WbGEQBkntOsIRqfBirubMapp02q kXsLfD3KP1caXyFeJ/xoFauwkhxBwJ8hq14yHNckCkEmwCe7aT8KAUbonwsEaw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=UYfPlWoz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1677841577; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=O8Gu4dNc4e1mZd3q9sNWtPB80xoF/qxpVJrVKjGMBE4WCKFipt8Z5VOgiTcAF+C32WCNMG dXlPrF091LDFt2EW7v1ax+uHhIFau/Lt3Z12BGukpHIeDdpndQEctjwpnSCpN17V8Ug8rw KOD512JH5tfIvrgOz6juufqOkee26oSe9G9ktawTdv+nlw/VDCMPT0y+2esvEeMfsOw+xx K1BlJfU5k9ShC3XmMqB6v3MjL/7mBU/SVmt0zoHi6gqypXoME0Mn3N7q2UIyTbYN3HmHhW ReWZMWBgLc/HCmx/0iG7/HfiUJ1g9padM5xLmiYbftt+hipjKk9ZVmpRy6Kr8g== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY3El-0001Ee-A4; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:06:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY3Eg-0001CR-Ta for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:06:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY3Eg-0007h9-KN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:06:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pY3Eg-0001rk-GK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#61674] [PATCH 0/4] gnu: stellarium: Enable ShowMySky. Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 11:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61674 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Sharlatan Hellseher , 61674@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 61674-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61674.16778415147094 (code B ref 61674); Fri, 03 Mar 2023 11:06:02 +0000 Received: (at 61674) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2023 11:05:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59769 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pY3Du-0001qM-2B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:05:14 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com ([209.85.167.51]:46798) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pY3Ds-0001q4-Gs for 61674@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:05:12 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id j11so3012681lfg.13 for <61674@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 03:05:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1677841506; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=jKPP+kdhi+ivfHl2XfnnQnFuLlY2k4F264uod80Ark4=; b=UYfPlWoz7Mw7ALw0fgnqmq6EVyFgUhO23vZQrcnyaKYxsUj3KFMcfZHKKt0fgOd7/A QuxPFtz8DfFdhMqzKkySPSrcINav7nP6G8MZeNV7gKbe86XSPn/eATqO21MT7IvNjoHs uIDVUH/cawLd3sappPaEbzB+Oqe2IDeZMr6S9MT/aNQJ+scxSEFzXM6UALOYSkJCA/d+ KXUhPf1Cja6EfQCstoRwLGl7ZJekT+6zURXl4DxCGcuRc+5aI03m1Xuf7E5u0S2/iH1N v603tz7WIfnTUgx1PD/3bGmbcaD3WTMUpfFYeV9/4Ysq9EY4Z9JW+7L1zxX+0KnU1TSJ rOOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677841506; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jKPP+kdhi+ivfHl2XfnnQnFuLlY2k4F264uod80Ark4=; b=Zc8vCRkYEDKg/EN/0MCcFDag24+y0Dvso7hMWZt012TzguosQF39WY1bY4JF4RiTCM fRrh5DhkyqNhX1SfHGyQRWC/BKYob4uOxQ+Of+lYOqb4uSP8V8pTLnGF33aGpIg+G2du q5ghvBLiNSRf2Cop1CKzVMLRYaLaTl4sOzfZngoG7Aa29JELTjAVXAOP4rXdLsR9oNc7 eWP1p4LvwYucv2lOXoi35DUbXC40MgFrIuU+/glBh1PXaSYv3/ZOaJZnXFqp9dJoNwU5 LfWb7/MZedDhANJFNRDqi+eiXP7ceJttcqDvJFDzz2BVy5ku7FfE88e5RSfT4ya/cAaF PvjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVhxhWrDlmF/B9WLinkXaEFUvYSsIK5khB70kaO65eJT1z2iahC aZiUYAy+BNVFknHDWpTvyxBSgYpwlds4XldfVqg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set95LxSrgNt2u4eswXjCxakcn/xYWqLs6jD05lITH6/n81Sw6ygLufSe8/Yh7lcFFL2Xy1A6N+LDT2OdSlXJweU= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:530d:0:b0:4db:1809:29a1 with SMTP id c13-20020ac2530d000000b004db180929a1mr2542276lfh.2.1677841506046; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 03:05:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230221130600.18932-1-sharlatanus@gmail.com> <20230226004406.6215-1-sharlatanus@gmail.com> <87ilfmhkuh.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87lekijcwi.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8jixg6u.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87v8jixg6u.fsf@gnu.org> From: Simon Tournier Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 12:04:54 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.00 X-Spam-Score: -2.00 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 35F23137FF List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-TUID: pi+IPp6pvpZW Hi, On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 11:49, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > This is so that the =E2=80=98replacement=E2=80=99 field of =E2=80=98calcm= ysky=E2=80=99, when there is > one, inherits the same transformations in =E2=80=98calcmysky-qt5=E2=80=99= . Quoth the > =E2=80=98package/inherit=E2=80=99 docstring: > > Like (package (inherit P) OVERRIDES ...), except that the same > transformation is done to the package P's replacement, if any. P must > be a bare identifier, and will be bound to either P or its replacement > when evaluating OVERRIDES. Thanks for the explanations but it is still unclear. Sorry to be slow. It is not clear for me why you choose one over the other. From my current understanding, I would be tempted to always use 'package/inherit' and never plain 'inherit'. Cheers, simon